A Thought:

Nov 15, 2005 00:13

The problem with criticism of art is that it tries to create objective ways of judging art. We have yet to develop any truly effective systems, and thus we end up obscuring what's actually good art in favor of what merely seems like good art.

Discuss.

thoughts, art, rants

Leave a comment

sam... smeddy November 16 2005, 07:06:18 UTC
Ok, my essays are at home, but here are some things that I remember ( ... )

Reply

Re: adam raqtateraid November 16 2005, 17:36:35 UTC
Adam you suck. I would love to discuss this with you in depth over thanksgiving break. So i can show you how flawed your theory is.

Reply

Re: adam smeddy November 16 2005, 19:58:56 UTC
What specifically do you not agree with? I'm not saying that you have to agree with me, but don't just tell me I suck, you won't win an argument that way...

Reply

Re: adam hejun2zeros November 16 2005, 21:46:20 UTC
Hey, that's the Herbie Weisberg method, and we all know how that's worked out.

Reply

Re: adam raqtateraid November 16 2005, 22:35:47 UTC
hey adam let's try and read my comment over again. "I would love to discuss this with you in depth over thanksgiving break." As in i don't have the time to do it now, but i will tell you why later. Also me saying you suck has nothing to do with my point, it's just a statement.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up