also, sam, i need to let you know that your music is unacceptable. now, i love the debussy quartet just like everyone else. my problem is not with the choice of music, it's with the choice of notation. writing "debussy g minor" implies that there is another debussy quartet, and there isn't. foolishly done. i don't approve.
correcting your erroneous comments is becoming tiresome but if i must:
debussy wrote a G MAJOR trio for piano and strings not to mention a quintet for flutes harps and a cello and plenty for FOUR hands some of which HAS been arranged for string quartet (with varying degrees of success) so now you see why i have identified the key, so that the work would be obvious
you have allowed your limited knowledge of the repertoire to, once again, make a mockery of you and all i can say is BOOOO
Re: uh, actually. . .yugaSeptember 11 2004, 18:03:29 UTC
actually actually i think sam is right, though perhaps the ambiguity would be slved had he added "debussy string quartet" as opposed to a key signature.
told by the best person ever.
i'm also touched.
love, munit
Reply
Reply
Reply
but if i must:
debussy wrote a G MAJOR trio for piano and strings
not to mention a quintet for flutes harps and a cello
and plenty for FOUR hands
some of which HAS been arranged for string quartet (with varying degrees of success)
so now you see why i have identified the key, so that the work would be obvious
you have allowed your limited knowledge of the repertoire to, once again, make a mockery of you
and all i can say is BOOOO
Reply
Nice try, though.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment