(no subject)

Apr 16, 2009 14:16

Match.com has been yielding some interesting results as of late. I'm eager to actually attempt meeting some of these guys. One guy sounds like he'd be great, but in his picture he's missing a distinct amount of hair. I pray to god this is some kind of post-hazing photo (although who would post such a thing?) cause he's only 26. I don't want to be superficial, but I will spend the night staring at his massive forehead otherwise.

He said something last night about putting gel in his hair. Either that means he actually does have hair, or it means he doesn't go through gel very quickly.

I'm terrible.

It fascinates me that some guys don't seem to know how the pictures they choose reflect on them in their profiles. I imagine it's the same for women's profiles, but I can't see those.

But guys, come on. If you're trying to win over a new lady, a picture of you with a beautiful woman isn't gonna sell you. Even if it's a sister or a cousin or "just a friend" it looks a little twitchy. There's nowhere to write a caption and explain who that beautiful woman is, so why put her up there and let us wonder? Either these guys are idiots, don't know what "cropping" is or all have gorgeous sisters. I'm inclined to believe the first two.

If you talk about being down to earth or laid back or not being superficial, don't include a picture of your car or motorcycle. Now, let's be fair, they want us to post pictures of things we love and enjoy doing, so that's fine in theory. But a picture of your Toyota or Honda isn't too impressive. And that picture of that Vette or that Mustang just makes me assume you have a small dick. And how about a picture of you WITH the car, or you IN the car, or you DRIVING the car? Am I dating you or your car?

I should post a picture of my Pontiac Vibe. And me surrounded by good looking men. I wonder if it would even register with anybody?
Previous post Next post
Up