Leave a comment

Comments 14

ex_uniquewo July 22 2007, 20:21:08 UTC
It's the characters and the world created that sucked me in more than anything and made me a fan. That, and the fanfiction

Having stopped at book 1, amen.

Reply

sabershadowkat July 23 2007, 00:48:49 UTC
Lol.

In book seven, a lot of that stuff was right out of fanfic, it felt like. Some of it my own fanfic, too. It was very odd. I guess us fans just wrote about everything, didn't we?

Reply


karadin July 22 2007, 21:58:37 UTC
Thanks for the post, you were able to put your finger on quite a few things that I wasn't able to articulate, but felt.

Reply

sabershadowkat July 23 2007, 00:49:16 UTC
You're welcome. Niggling thoughts like that keep me up at night.

Reply


darlulu July 22 2007, 22:05:31 UTC
If Snape was put in place at Hogwarts under Dumbledore's cunning scheme to protect the children, why were the children getting crucioed? I can see him letting bullying slide, but DE-teacher induced punishment such at that makes Snape into a bad hero figure.

Yeah, that was a real stumbling block for me as well. It was around that time that I started to wonder if I'd been wrong after all and that Snape really was a baddie. In the end, I think it was just lazy writing to blame.

Reply

sabershadowkat July 23 2007, 00:50:59 UTC
Lazy writing seems to be in abundance in seven. It's a shame. Lots of tell, not show, which stunk.

Reply


tahariel July 22 2007, 22:43:04 UTC
As I mull it over, Bbook seven has its great moments, like all the HP books do, but it has a whole hell of a lot more flaws that can't be excused as it's the last book.

Word. There was so much wasted potential for this book - I wrote a huge long post on my lj about it. I liked the book, generally, but I LOVED the others. There's a huge difference. I'm so sad that this is all we get. It really could have done with another year of editing - the plot was so messy, the exposition so heavy. It was clumsy. The things she'd been so good at before just weren't there.

It makes me sad, is all.

Reply


tangledaria July 23 2007, 00:16:30 UTC
-If Snape was put in place at Hogwarts under Dumbledore's cunning scheme to protect the children, why were the children getting crucioed? I can see him letting bullying slide, but DE-teacher induced punishment such at that makes Snape into a bad hero figure.

I think that, in some twisted way, maybe he was protecting them there more than they would have been out in the "real world". If they weren't at Hogwarts, then anyone and everyone would have been vulnerable. Snape could keep his eye on the Slytherins, pretending to be Voldemort's right hand man, pretending to be on their side. He could prevent anyone from falling into Voldemort's hands, from either joining him or fighting him. All of the brave Gryffindors, all of the Ravenclaws and Hufflepuffs would only have to suffer, at worse, the Cruciatus, rather than the Killing Curse if they had rushed headlong into battle.

*shrugs* It's a stretch, but there it is. And if you ever, EVER talk bad about Snape again. *shakes fist* XD

Reply

sabershadowkat July 23 2007, 00:46:20 UTC
Good BSing *g* Snape seemed wasted in the book, to me, though. He felt almost like an extra character instead of the second main focus of the story, like he has been since the beginning. Sniff. An unfitting end.

Reply

tangledaria July 23 2007, 01:47:36 UTC
I liked that he jumped out the window and started flying around. That was fucking awesome.

I have to say that I liked this book the best. Yeah, he wasn't the second main focus in this book, but I think everyone was kind of pushed to the side in favor of the Harry Potter trio. The sacrifice he made, the story his life told, that was good enough for me. That the fact that he and Dumbledore were BFF.

Reply

sabershadowkat July 23 2007, 03:15:28 UTC
The BFF thing was pretty great. I loved all the history stuff. And the bat was pretty cool. Still wish there'd been *more*

*pouts*

Reply


Leave a comment

Up