Bear Code
I've never actually published my Bear Code classification. I guess now is as good a time as any.
B3 d+ e f g(++) k(-/+) q- r s+ t w (i p--)
Well, that was fun.
For translation, see http://resourcesforbears.com/nbcs/. If you have completed your own BC classification, post it as a comment here. :)
EDIT 1: I had to adjust a couple of these once I used the generator found on the site above, but pretty much the same as initially constructed.
EDIT 2: And, why don't they have a component for sexual position? I know it's not something upon which everyone places great emphasis, but neither is how much someone like to grope and be groped. And, I know it's not something that everyone wishes to talk about up front, but neither are cock size or relationship orientation. Furthermore, not all those who are Daddy-identified are total tops. Likewise, not all those who are cub-identified are total bottoms. So, it just seems an obvious choice for another parameter that is at least somewhat important to some. So, here's my suggestion:
p - "The POSITION Factor"
p++ total bottom
p+ bottom, but will top occasionally
p totally versatile
(none) preferred position not indicated
p- top, but will bottom occasionally
p-- total top
And, yes, I put bottom as '+' and top as '-', mostly because I think it's more difficult (and therefore more complimentary) to be a good bottom than it is a good top.
B3 d+ e f g(++) k(-/+) q- r s+ t w (i p--)
Well, that was fun.
For translation, see http://resourcesforbears.com/nbcs/. If you have completed your own BC classification, post it as a comment here. :)
EDIT 1: I had to adjust a couple of these once I used the generator found on the site above, but pretty much the same as initially constructed.
EDIT 2: And, why don't they have a component for sexual position? I know it's not something upon which everyone places great emphasis, but neither is how much someone like to grope and be groped. And, I know it's not something that everyone wishes to talk about up front, but neither are cock size or relationship orientation. Furthermore, not all those who are Daddy-identified are total tops. Likewise, not all those who are cub-identified are total bottoms. So, it just seems an obvious choice for another parameter that is at least somewhat important to some. So, here's my suggestion:
p - "The POSITION Factor"
And, yes, I put bottom as '+' and top as '-', mostly because I think it's more difficult (and therefore more complimentary) to be a good bottom than it is a good top.