RP ADVICE MEME 06

Sep 04, 2009 07:53


MEME 06

➢  As always, you may comment anonymously or logged in.

➢  ReCAPTCHA and IP logging are off.

➢  Please put the character's name first followed by the title of the series in the comment's subject line.

➢  For consistency's sake, use Western name order.

➢  As per the rule in the meme before, try not to duplicate names; it makes things easier to ( Read more... )

!meme 06

Leave a comment

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 5 2009, 01:55:27 UTC
- Harry needs a purpose and something to do. He'll want to help people and play hero, especially in a game that has a plot. Harry does get into trouble a lot because he's a proactive character and he doesn't like to sit on his hands. Even if he's post-Deathly Hallows, I think there will be some part of him that will want to be active.

- Keep in mind that Harry is kind of a brat. Self-righteous, indignant. This is something especially prevalent in the last two books. He'll do things boldly without thinking, and it will be kind of dickish. Like the time in Deathly Hallows when he decides to say Voldemort's name anyway. Or a time in Half-Blood Prince, when he basically rudely calls Hermione a nag. Harry isn't all sunshine and daisies. He can be a bit of a prick at times.

- The above is NOT the same thing as being an emobrat. Harry hasn't been an emobrat since book five. He has moments in six and seven, but it's different and ... slightly more justified, in those circumstances.

- Harry ... generally is a brat, but he doesn't force people to do things against their will. He's pretty considerate in that aspect and has grown up a lot. I think he'd be pretty honest with people.

- Harry's witty and has a good sense of humor and isn't angry all the time, but he isn't happy all the time, either. He's sort of balanced, but tends to tilt to one side or the other. He's never zen. He has his good days and his bad days. But I'd never say he's OVERLY cheerful.

- As it comes to friends, Ron and Hermione come first. Then Ginny. Then everyone else. Obviously, there's a weird sequence there, but Harry is actually sort of an elitist when it comes to his friends. He doesn't get to know Seamus or Dean as well as he could, and that's fairly obvious in the books. He doesn't even know Neville that way--but in the same turn, he and Luna have that quiet understanding.

- Oh. In the last book, he's capable of using Unforgivables. Harry does have a sadistic streak to him. While the spells have some importance in the storyline, they're done with little pretense in the final book. I think this is for a reason. I think he probably could EASILY do them in HBP, after he realizes he and Voldemort will undoubtedly have to fight, because that's what it's become. But Harry did kill Voldemort with expelliarmus. He won't go to that first, ever. He has that darker streak, but he also has that side of him that isn't going to think "let's imperius them" before using some other means. Unless the situation calls for it (as it often does in Deathly Hallows).

Reply

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 5 2009, 17:35:16 UTC
...what about post-canon?

/not the same anon

Reply

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 5 2009, 21:37:07 UTC
Post-canon, a lot of the same stuff applies. I don't think Harry stops being a proactive person. Remember: in less than ten years, he's head of the Aurors. He doesn't get there through sitting on his thumb. I think he'll grow up and he'll balance out his temperament, but if you're playing him directly post-Deathly Hallows, that's going to take time. He needed to get away from the excitement, but there is a part of him by that point in time that doesn't want NORMALCY, but just doesn't want "trouble." Getting rid of trouble doesn't mean the same as shedding his responsibilities; if there is something bad going on, he'll want to fix it.

However, if nothing bad is going on? I think he'll like that a lot.

If you're taking him POST-EPILOGUE post-canon, I think he would still be the same character, just more mature, with a healthy sense of humor and probably a better head on his shoulders. Harry has always been heading there, he's just gone through being a teenager and his own conflict to get there. He needs to be someone who would be the head of the Aurors, but I don't think he'd lose that sense of righteousness and would occasionally still want things to go his way (without thinking of others first). It wouldn't be a constant, but that's how it is. Even in the epilogue, we see that he has a grudging respect for Malfoy, but he sticks to his clique. Harry hasn't changed THAT much.

Reply

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 5 2009, 22:33:23 UTC
He's going to a panfandom game, couple of months afte the book (before the epilogue). So, yeah. I think he'll be happy considering who's going to be there and so on FAMILY ROCKS. Even if they don't know you. He'll probably devote himself to trying to find a way back though, I think. Possibly get distracted and have some fun.

THANK YOU.

Reply

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 6 2009, 00:37:35 UTC
YEAH, Harry's very :D :D :D about his family. Even if he can get distracted, I think he'll ALWAYS have the "getting back" on the back of his mind, even when it turns out it's hopeless. I currently play him in a panfandom, too, and that's the approach I take. He has fun once in a while, but there's always that pressing concern there. Plus, as neatly as JK Rowling wrapped things up, I doubt everything was fixed mere minutes after he killed Voldemort.

Reply

Re: Harry Potter - Harry Potter anonymous September 6 2009, 12:27:08 UTC
Nooo me neither. I plan to possibly deal with some PTSD as well (at least nightmares and so on, considering how he was after GoF). I think his main issue is that he doesn't have anyone from his timeframe so he may have to do research (as it's a secret why everyone's there) BY HIMSELF to get back home. He might find that tricky.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up