May 18, 2005 23:38
REFERENCES
Karau, Steven J; Williams K. D (1996) Social loafing: Research findings, implications and future directions. Current directions in Psychological Science. 4, 134-140.
Liden, R C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski, R. A, ; Bennett, N (2004) Social Loafing: A Field Investigation. Journal of Management, 30, 285-304.
Price, K.H (1987) Decision responsibility, task responsibility, identifiability, and social loafing. Organizational Behaviour & Human Decision Processes. 40, 330-345
Wageman, Ruth (1999). Task design, outcome interdependence, and individual differences: Their joint effects on effort in task-performing teams (Commentary on Huguet et al., 1999).Group Dynamics. 3, 132-137.
Reference within Wageman & Ruth (1999);
Huguet, P., Charbonnier, E., & Monteil, J.-M. (1999). Productivity loss in performance groups: People who see themselves as average do not engage in social loafing. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 118-131.
Williams, K., Harkins, S., Latane, B (1981) Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing - 2 cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 40, 303-311.
APA????
Jackson, Jeffrey M; Harkins, Stephen G. Equity in effort: An explanation of the social loafing effect. [Peer Reviewed Journal] Journal of Personality & Social Psychology. Vol 49(5) Nov 1985, 1199-1206. American Psychological Assn, US
Liden, Robert C; Wayne, Sandy J; Jaworski, Renata A; Bennett, Nathan. Social Loafing: A Field Investigation. [References]. [Peer Reviewed Journal] Journal of Management. Vol 30(2) 2004, 285-304. Elsevier Science, Netherlands
Wageman, Ruth. Task design, outcome interdependence, and individual differences: Their joint effects on effort in task-performing teams (Commentary on Huguet et al., 1999). [References]. [Peer Reviewed Journal] Group Dynamics. Vol 3(2) Jun 1999, 132-137. Educational Publishing Foundation, US
Reference within Wageman & Ruth (1999);
Huguet, P., Charbonnier, E., & Monteil, J.-M. (1999). Productivity loss in performance groups: People who see themselves as average do not engage in social loafing. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3, 118-131.