A 3 years old painting Ninja Turtle, Fake or Real?
Take a look at this.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2033106777
Okay this really irks me, how can a three years old can recognize the highlighting, shading, and shadows? A lot of people on myspace are falling for the real category and they are saying to people who think it fake are just jealous that they can't draw like him. As for me I definably voted for fake. I can share you reasons why it fake:
1. Camera tricks, I don't even see his head in the picture while painting upclose.
2. If you look at when he first started the picture, you can see a large spots grouping together, then all the sudden the spots is gone while working on the top part of the head.
3. Look at his hand closely, fingers not moving and such a stiff arm to paint. It look like a doll hand, there no way you can be so stiff for long period of time painting.
4. On the first upclose of the boy, the camera avoiding showing the hand movem
4. The kid wanted to paint Michelangelo and there are two Ninja Turtles toys on the table with Mike and Leonardo. Instead he painting Leonardo, which is pretty suspicious.
5. Lastly, the paper... When he lifted the picture up. All the sudden it all glossy and no paint wrinkles. At the beginning of the painting process, you can see the wrinkles and textures from the paint and when he finished it all smooth and glossy?
When I was little like that, my mother telling me how I used to draw shapes on the back of the kids menu with crayons. While other kids scribbles, I just draw little shapes...Not like geometric shapes but just unusual shapes. My mother even have the menu saved somewhere in the shed.
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2033106777
Okay this really irks me, how can a three years old can recognize the highlighting, shading, and shadows? A lot of people on myspace are falling for the real category and they are saying to people who think it fake are just jealous that they can't draw like him. As for me I definably voted for fake. I can share you reasons why it fake:
1. Camera tricks, I don't even see his head in the picture while painting upclose.
2. If you look at when he first started the picture, you can see a large spots grouping together, then all the sudden the spots is gone while working on the top part of the head.
3. Look at his hand closely, fingers not moving and such a stiff arm to paint. It look like a doll hand, there no way you can be so stiff for long period of time painting.
4. On the first upclose of the boy, the camera avoiding showing the hand movem
4. The kid wanted to paint Michelangelo and there are two Ninja Turtles toys on the table with Mike and Leonardo. Instead he painting Leonardo, which is pretty suspicious.
5. Lastly, the paper... When he lifted the picture up. All the sudden it all glossy and no paint wrinkles. At the beginning of the painting process, you can see the wrinkles and textures from the paint and when he finished it all smooth and glossy?
When I was little like that, my mother telling me how I used to draw shapes on the back of the kids menu with crayons. While other kids scribbles, I just draw little shapes...Not like geometric shapes but just unusual shapes. My mother even have the menu saved somewhere in the shed.