Housekeeping and the odd manifesto.

Oct 12, 2005 13:11

Just a few housekeeping notes:

I've redone my info blurb for the first time in almost two years. Yes, almost two years, *gasp*, you've been stuck with me for that long. *g*

Apologies to my dial-up friends, but I succumbed to the banner craze.

Thanks to the lovely marenfic, I've finally figured out how to put up the banner that I commissioned from xanphibian. ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

shadowscast October 13 2005, 07:08:50 UTC
Okay, wow. There are so many brilliant observations in that essay, I want to quote, like, the whole thing back at you and say "Yes! Yes! Yes!"

A couple bits that stood out especially:

Angelus discarded Penn, abandoned him pretty much after he turned him. Penn was a failed project. So Spike is wrong, Angelus didn't want a mirror. He had no use for one. Angelus is a family man; Angelus wanted a legacy.

That's a really interesting point. Hmm. Cool. I liked the observation that Spike was a "project" to Angelus, too.

This exchange is all very funny, but what we need to remember is that this takes place after Cordy dies, after Angel has his vision.

Okay, wow. You know, that hadn't even occurred to me. That changes the whole meaning that exchange.

Reply

romanyg October 13 2005, 23:13:58 UTC
*blushes* Thank you!

I liked the observation that Spike was a "project" to Angelus, too.

As much as Spike would like to think that his persona is of his own devising, Angelus certainly had a hand in it. Like a scultor waiting for the marble to speak, Angelus may have been intrigued by the surprises within. A masterpiece is only fully realized upon completion.

And in his anger during "Destiny", Spike did credit Angelus for making him who he was.

That changes the whole meaning that exchange.

Yes, I hadn't realized it until I started having to work out a timeline for a fic that I'm working on and then *lightbulb* I realized that Angel might have a motivation that he's not giving voice to.

Reply

dlgood October 14 2005, 15:18:18 UTC
And in his anger during "Destiny", Spike did credit Angelus for making him who he was.

And Angel's reply is interesting too - "I didn't make you a monster. I opened a door and you walked through it."

Which tells you something about Angelus the sculptor. That he was looking for interactive media to work with... not some malleable automaton. As you mentioned, he opened that door with Penn too and he was never anything resembling proud or impressed with him. Whereas he is with Spike.

The other interesting thing is that Angel(us) probably looks at Dru as his greatest/most terrible creation... but he's also somewhat bored with her. He's not bored with Spike. Because IMHO he thinks Spike's not done. More work to do with the boy, so to speak.

Reply

romanyg October 15 2005, 19:00:16 UTC
And Angel's reply is interesting too - "I didn't make you a monster. I opened a door and you walked through it."

Yes, in denying responsibility in the making of Spike, Angel admits, unwittingly or no, the potential that he saw there. Penn just stayed in that doorway. He didn't change his MO for 200 years, never invented anything of his own, nothing that Angelus could take pride in.

And yes, Dru is a finished work, although she's not incapable of inventiveness either. I think her turning William took Angelus by surprise and intrigued him.

And yes, he doesn't feel Spike's done. In S2, despite his obsession with Buffy, Angelus took the time to sculpt him even more, with unexpected results.

Reply

dlgood October 15 2005, 21:38:42 UTC
Yes, in denying responsibility in the making of Spike, Angel admits, unwittingly or no, the potential that he saw there.

Yeah. He's doing a few things. The main point was that Spike bears a lot of responsiblity because Spike did make choices too. So he gets the credit... in the form of respect that he was capable of it (from the perspective of someone who likes the evildoing) and the disapproval from someone who has rejected it in trying to be a good person... It's the same sort of ambivalence Angel holds towards his own record of behavior. It's sort of a perverse sign of regard...

Reply

romanyg October 17 2005, 00:27:44 UTC
It's the same sort of ambivalence Angel holds towards his own record of behavior. It's sort of a perverse sign of regard...

Yes, if he holds Spike to his own standards then Angel also thinks that Spike is capable of failing or achieving them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up