Psychologically, this need for a religion of intellectual simplicity and moral constraint may also proceed from a need and desire to see others punished; but that edges into speculation. It does, though, have another and deeply negative consequence: the sustaining and encouraging of an aggressive (and equally simplistic) atheism and spiritual (as
(
Read more... )
I still don't see much difference between the secular and religious people. The fascists and fundamentalists can be found in both. The wise and engaged skeptic likewise. The noob, the joiner and the member of the social community. The 'just good and caring' and the evil.
Two of my fav colleagues and friends are you and Fil Salustri (http://www.weareatheism.com/filippo-fil-a-salustri/)... and I don't know what you call this class of person, but it is a good class. Thoughtful, reflective and caring.
What I learn from both of you is that religion is a socially constructed fiction that is little different from the socially constructed fictions that are non-religious.
Not saying there's no god(s)(esses)(etc.). Nor am I saying that these beliefs have no relation to them. I never found the question of their existing or not existing much of an issue to me. I also didn't freak out over the higgs boson. Interesting and useful, but life didn't change much the day before or after.
For me, this is all a neurotypical thing (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurodiversity) that in and of itself is pretty harmless. The dangers come from the other strata that are ubiquitously present.
I want to know what people do with their (non)beliefs. Making cupcakes is real. So is making land mines. And regardless of faith or lack thereof, that's what concerns me.
And reading interesting blog posts.
Reply
The point that gets made far too little is that faith is not belief in the sense of believing or not that X or Y exists. It's a personal relationship.
Now back to poetry.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment