Back when I was 17, I went through the process of applying for university courses. I knew I wanted to study Physics with a specialization in a space related field, but at the time it wasn't really clear to me what the difference between "astrophysics" and "space science/technology" was. Somebody, and I confess I have sadly forgotten who, explained
(
Read more... )
There have been lots of studies looking into cleaning up the debris, but it's a really difficult thing to do. You can't just go up with a hoover. The two biggest problems are:
1. the immense distances between objects. This makes it difficult for your womble to get to and clean up more pieces of debris than you added by launching it - and more expensive.
2. the huge speeds involved. We're talking about several km per second, or thousands of mph. How do you "collect" something that is capable of punching a hole straight through you like a rail gun? If you try to match speed with each object, the propellant you'd need to carry with you goes up exponentially.
Of course, cleaning it up is a much better goal - but we don't seem to be able to find a way to do it, and the laser might be a reasonable "stop gap" option until we do.
It also opens up a number of possible cleanup options. For example, if you can direct debris pieces one by one into similar orbits as each other then you might conceivably be able to create a giant "dustbin orbit" where we can "park" debris pieces safely, without endangering other spacecraft. We actually already do something similar with "dead" spacecraft which cannot be safely de-orbited.
Reply
Leave a comment