no sense
what i don't get ..
is why "anti-war" is such a radical thought. i understand that in order for humans to be inspired to be good, there must be bad...but aren't the natural tragedies enough? for example, the tsunami-everyone became "good" people, and tried to help or donate to the cause. -which is great, not that we should have huge disasters to get people to help anyway. but is war necessary for people to realize they should be good people? i dont think so.