Joe Strummer - Redemption Song

Jan 03, 2007 17:04

The thing I wanted most for Christmas was Redemption Song, the new Joe Strummer biography. 660 pages, with pics I hadn't seen before, lots of them of Mick Jones when he still had hair. I'd been looking forward to it since it came out in October ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

miraminx January 4 2007, 05:11:56 UTC
Oh, man. That disappoints and saddens me too. I don't actively avoid finding out things about artists (musicians, writers) whose work I admire, but I don't necessarily seek it out, either, for this reason. This information about Joe Strummer is the most extreme example I can think of, of someone whose work I respect and even love turning out to be, well, a shit. That shouldn't affect how I feel about his music, but it's hard not to let it creep (sorry) in there.

Something music-related that has made me happy, on the other hand, is the 10th anniversary edition of Everything Must Go, which I bought for myself a couple of months ago. Just hearing Nicky Wire say 'slutty' was worth the $30.

Reply

rochefort January 4 2007, 12:30:17 UTC
I thought of you while I was reading it, and how disappointed you would be, too ( ... )

Reply

miraminx January 5 2007, 03:50:38 UTC
I have mixed feelings because in some cases it's fun and entertaining to find out more about the people behind the art/music. So, for example, I got a book about Big Star -- ironically enough, published only in the UK-- that I thoroughly enjoyed. But then, I already knew that Alex Chilton was basically an unpleasant person; and what I really liked about the book was that it was the story of the band, not a biography of Chilton, although it did tell the life story of the band members.

Is there a good book about The Clash that would be the equivalent-- something that would give some analysis (and in 600+ pages, how did the author resist the urge to tell you What It All Meant? Amazing)?

I'd rather be called someone's casual fuck than be called their 'lady'.The way that some British men refer to their partners as "my missus", even when they're not actually bound in wedlock, rubs me the same, wrong way-- I think because it evokes "the little lady" a little too strongly for my taste ( ... )

Reply

miraminx January 5 2007, 17:20:05 UTC
Not to spam you or anything, but I finally managed to put into words why it bothers me so much that Joe Strummer in particular was such a misogynist, whereas I wouldn't have been nearly as crushed to hear that, say, Billy Idol held the same beliefs. Okay, bad example-- I'll say Alex Chilton again, he can be my default. In fact Alex has some rather creepy tendencies towards much younger women, but that doesn't put me off Big Star. Back on track, and I know you've already realized this much earlier than I did, but it bothers me with Joe because his social justice agenda was so upfront and such a part of his public and artistic persona. So does this mean that he only really believed in social justice for half the human race?

Now I really will stop commenting, I promise. mwah!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

rochefort January 5 2007, 19:56:21 UTC
Yes, 'common' is the right word. Yet as Minx said, this behaviour was from someone who was known for his stand on social justice. It seems to be easy for some men to talk about social justice, but acting on it every day -- that's another matter.

My reaction to this is like a very, very watered-down version of the disillusionment I felt years ago when I heard about Daniel Ortega abusing his step-daughter. 'No more heroes', as they say. (Ugh, I can't believe I just quoted Hugh Cornwell.)

I'm glad you don't mind my rant!
*hugs you back*

Reply


miraminx January 5 2007, 03:55:58 UTC
And on a really, truly, completely unrelated note, Jay Tryfanstone wrote an utterly wonderful Duncan/Methos Christmas story:

Misrule

Reply

rochefort January 5 2007, 19:56:57 UTC
Oh, thank you for telling me! Her writing's unbelievable. I'm bookmarking this for later.
x

Reply


Leave a comment

Up