If I didn't say it clear enough or I didn't express very well, now I'm saying it again.
First, I need to clarify my oppinion on the " screen the comment " issue.
After I posted my second post yesterday, motoko_cydalima replied my comment and told me, in your culture ( customary? ), you don't think screened the comments without any notification is taking the apology back. I'm rather suprised by the culture difference. Because in our society/culture/customary it's a common sense that if a comment is screened without any notification, it means:
1. the comments contain bad things, like curses, insults, or something illegal, which are meaningless or shouldn't be there.
2. the commenters/ the owner wants to take back their/other people's words or they don't approve the comments or they just want to hide the truth. ( which are all concidered quite rude and unacceptable ).
That's why I thought you took back the apology and get angry at first.
When I saw you admitted it's you and made a public apology. I would say that I admired your courage, I really did. But I didn't think that you know why I'm angry is because of you screened the comment without any notification, so I made the second post.
And which I said [ I'm not asking a public apology ] means [ if you didn't screen the comments, the first " you're right, I'm sorry " is enough ].
Is that clear to you now?
Unfortunately I didn't realize the oppinion of screening comments is so different between us then, until motoko_cydalima told me her oppinion.
( And no offense, just to clarify: Why I mentioned her but not you? Because it's not yours, but her words to let me come to realize that you screened the comments is not to take the sorry back, and it was just to change the page and continue with the topic of the post where the banner was. )
So, after I replied motoko_cydalima's comment yesterday, I can took it as a culture difference by now.
Now we can talk about the notification part. You asked me " If you cared so much notice, why not sent me one first? "
And I'm here telling you, I didn't send you a notification first is because at that time, I thought you just took back the apology and that made me angry.
For you and your friends' information. I'm sick of art stealing. When it comes to the right of the artists, I'm quite protective about that. Not only to myself, but also to everyone who creat art works.
So, that's why I made my first post on my LJ then.
May I ask you, at that time, when I thought my work was seized from me to make a banner without my permission. I thought I got an apology but was screened the next day. When I thought you screened the sorry and took it back like I don't even deserve at least a sorry.
Can't I get angry? Can't I write it down in my personal journal? I don't even have the right to be angry and talk about it? At that time?
And in the second post, I'm simply trying to tell you why I'm angry. Actually, I'm still bothered by the huge culture difference. Which you think it's no big deal is really mattered to me. But okay, if that's your culture, I can respect that. I hope at least you can respect mine too.
So no, I'm not promoting such hatred against you, and let everybody let go so much venom against you. For God's sake, I didn't even mention your name in my first post. If there is anything comes near hatred in my posts, that can only be my feeling against art stealing.
If you still think I took so much time to write this to you is promoting hatred and let everybody let go venom against you. Then I must say, I'm disappointed too.
And here is my reply to your question " so, you don´t accept my apology after all, right? "
As long as I know that you screened the comments is not to take back your apology, the first " you're right, I'm sorry " is enough for me.
First, I need to clarify my oppinion on the " screen the comment " issue.
After I posted my second post yesterday, motoko_cydalima replied my comment and told me, in your culture ( customary? ), you don't think screened the comments without any notification is taking the apology back. I'm rather suprised by the culture difference. Because in our society/culture/customary it's a common sense that if a comment is screened without any notification, it means:
1. the comments contain bad things, like curses, insults, or something illegal, which are meaningless or shouldn't be there.
2. the commenters/ the owner wants to take back their/other people's words or they don't approve the comments or they just want to hide the truth. ( which are all concidered quite rude and unacceptable ).
That's why I thought you took back the apology and get angry at first.
When I saw you admitted it's you and made a public apology. I would say that I admired your courage, I really did. But I didn't think that you know why I'm angry is because of you screened the comment without any notification, so I made the second post.
And which I said [ I'm not asking a public apology ] means [ if you didn't screen the comments, the first " you're right, I'm sorry " is enough ].
Is that clear to you now?
Unfortunately I didn't realize the oppinion of screening comments is so different between us then, until motoko_cydalima told me her oppinion.
( And no offense, just to clarify: Why I mentioned her but not you? Because it's not yours, but her words to let me come to realize that you screened the comments is not to take the sorry back, and it was just to change the page and continue with the topic of the post where the banner was. )
So, after I replied motoko_cydalima's comment yesterday, I can took it as a culture difference by now.
Now we can talk about the notification part.
You asked me " If you cared so much notice, why not sent me one first? "
And I'm here telling you, I didn't send you a notification first is because at that time, I thought you just took back the apology and that made me angry.
For you and your friends' information. I'm sick of art stealing. When it comes to the right of the artists, I'm quite protective about that. Not only to myself, but also to everyone who creat art works.
So, that's why I made my first post on my LJ then.
May I ask you, at that time, when I thought my work was seized from me to make a banner without my permission. I thought I got an apology but was screened the next day. When I thought you screened the sorry and took it back like I don't even deserve at least a sorry.
Can't I get angry? Can't I write it down in my personal journal? I don't even have the right to be angry and talk about it? At that time?
And in the second post, I'm simply trying to tell you why I'm angry. Actually, I'm still bothered by the huge culture difference. Which you think it's no big deal is really mattered to me. But okay, if that's your culture, I can respect that. I hope at least you can respect mine too.
So no, I'm not promoting such hatred against you, and let everybody let go so much venom against you. For God's sake, I didn't even mention your name in my first post. If there is anything comes near hatred in my posts, that can only be my feeling against art stealing.
If you still think I took so much time to write this to you is promoting hatred and let everybody let go venom against you. Then I must say, I'm disappointed too.
And here is my reply to your question " so, you don´t accept my apology after all, right? "
As long as I know that you screened the comments is not to take back your apology, the first " you're right, I'm sorry " is enough for me.
Reply
Leave a comment