More Politics

Jan 30, 2011 21:57

Another political question, so don't click past the cut if you don't care.

Read more... )

Leave a comment

catlin January 31 2011, 06:06:37 UTC
Health Care: Significant increase

A society is judged by how it treats its weaker members. The cost of basic medical care is ugly enough, but catastrophic medical care is crippling to middle class families. These are the same middle class families that PAY taxes, Spend money on Things that build the economy, and try to save money for retirement.

When something happens, cancer, accident, whatever, they can no longer do any of that. They are then going bankrupt and making the economic situation worse for other people too.

Reply

valr January 31 2011, 15:45:24 UTC
Actually I can think of a very inexpensive long term solution to this problem. This solution is quite contrary to my typical thinking about how government should work, but it's a clear resolution to the Health Care Costs issue:

Pass Federal Legislation that denies the ability of Private Health Insurance Companies to be operated as For-Profit Businesses. Secondarily, require those same businesses to adhere legally to the Hippocratic Oath.

Reply

catlin January 31 2011, 22:36:11 UTC
I can agree to this, as long as they are not allowed to form monopolies as well

Reply

rhodri2112 January 31 2011, 16:18:22 UTC
My question is why should this be the responsibility of the federal government ( ... )

Reply

catlin January 31 2011, 22:32:35 UTC
I disagree with a lot of this. States can't handle this, because they don't want to. No level of the government gives a damn about the basic people these days. I see no reason why giving it to the state makes any damn difference then giving it to the federal government. Explain to me how states are any less corrupt or inefficient? (remembering that I live in kansas, where I know damn good and well my "elected" officials give a damn only for the businesses and their profits, because why else would they still give tax incentives to businesses that are actively laying people off ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up