I've said it once, and I'll say in again.

[revolution_boi]

In so far as the government of the United States of America is involved, marriage is a blanket contract for a series of other binding legal contracts between two people. The governing of this contract is purely legal and therefore, the right to enter into such a contract cannot be denied to any party of sound mind and legal age of consent or greater. The application of gender or sexuality into any official definition of marriage lends a divided and prejudicial establishment ad jure. This is unacceptable, as is a separate establishment of lesser value. Separate is inherently unequal as established by Brown v. Board of Edu. . Granted in the case of schools it involved unequally funded schools, but the underlying issue was self worth as function of social worth. The creation of a second class will neither be acceptable nor tolerated in any way shape or form in a society as advanced as ours. This Republic must not allow ourselves to repeat the mistakes of old.

Charles II
Lord High Chancellor
Prince of Peace