¤ IX ¤

Jul 09, 2010 01:14

I am... at a loss ( Read more... )

¤mesprit, ¤wendy, ¤brendan, ¤empoleon, ¤cyrus, ¤knuckles

Leave a comment

will_be_god July 9 2010, 08:25:34 UTC
If you are speaking of my instruction, the point was to demonstrate the folly, the irrationality, of hatred. You are aware of this. You aided me in the speech.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 08:27:30 UTC
Well, of that I understand... I wouldn't say I exactly aided in the colloquial part of it, but as I had said, I did lend my aid. That doesn't necessarily mean I'm exactly... blind, Cyrus.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 08:30:16 UTC
You knew of the subject matter. You knew my intention to pull examples from those present.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 08:31:53 UTC
...I'm not in the position to question your methods and reasoning, but are you sure you should have done it the way you did? I think I might have...

[This really isn't her right to say, is it?]

...Nothing. Never mind.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 08:32:59 UTC
Finish that thought. You believed it important enough that I read the first part of that sentence. Now conclude it.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 08:35:42 UTC
It isn't my class. I am not in a position to say these things to you. That doesn't mean, however, that I won't think on it myself.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 08:52:40 UTC
You are my assistant. I appointed you as such. I value your word...provided it is free from irrationality.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 08:54:37 UTC
I was under the impression you define everything about me to be irrational, Cyrus.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 09:15:53 UTC
Not everything. I would not have appointed you to such a position if I believed you to be a lost cause.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 09:17:22 UTC
I am forever confused by you. You adore me and despise me all the same. I'm not sure you know what you want, aside from using me to obtain your desired result.

Or perhaps you aim to show me what a glorious life I can lead if we were to share it together.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 09:18:54 UTC
What a sentimental statement. Although I am unsure if you are being sarcastic.

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 09:20:12 UTC
Which do you suppose it is?

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 09:27:04 UTC
First, define "together".

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 09:30:48 UTC
I think I prefer it when I make you run in circles, trying to figure out what I mean.

Reply

will_be_god July 9 2010, 09:37:52 UTC
You take delight in being intentionally murky?

Reply

reservedempath July 9 2010, 09:38:40 UTC
With you, yes. You torment me. It seems fair to torment you in return.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up