secrets post #11!

Mar 03, 2006 22:45


01;

Read more... )

secrets

Leave a comment

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 03:48:14 UTC
17. IMDb is like bad crack.
18. I agree with you there - maybe not that the person should be fired, per se, but I do agree that those were the only times she looked older.

Reply

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 04:08:30 UTC
Yeah, I admit it was harsh of me to say they should be fired, but she looks so young in the other scenes it was just a bit sudden. One thing I've noticed, though, is when her hair is pulled back (like on those pics) she looks older than when it's down. Maybe that had something to do with it. *shrugs*

Reply

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 04:13:24 UTC
She's 35, why shouldn't she look like a 35 year old? Have a look at her in person and it's pretty clear.

Reply

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 04:19:50 UTC
Like I said, it's mostly due to the fact that it was strange to see Maureen look older than Joanne. In addition, for the beginning part of the film, she hadn't looked that old, so it was a very sudden change.

Reply

pumpkins_n_pups March 4 2006, 04:34:20 UTC
Uh, because the character she's portraying isn't 35?

Reply

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 04:37:31 UTC
Well, her characters age is never stated, so she could very well be playing someone who is 35. It's just that she went from looking 21 to looking 35 so suddenly.

Reply

dramaturgy March 4 2006, 04:56:56 UTC
'sokay, you had a valid point. :]

Reply


Leave a comment

Up