strange how potent cheap music is

Dec 20, 2006 01:55

Everyone loves sunsets. I've got a sunset photo on Flickr, which some of you may (or may not) remember. It has every cliche in the book - waves rumbling across the frame, the low duck-yolk sun catching the Statue of Liberty in silhouette and setting her torch on fire ( Read more... )

music, sg, photos

Leave a comment

queerbychoice December 20 2006, 00:36:40 UTC
That's a fantastic sunset, but it looks slightly posterized. You might want to lessen the JPEG compression or something.

Reply

rekraft December 20 2006, 17:02:30 UTC
Yeah, funny, but it was already unusually lossy when I downloaded it to my computer. I suppose I was asking for it, shooting in JPG, but the difference in quality usually isn't that noticeable...

Reply

queerbychoice December 21 2006, 00:59:03 UTC
Heh, I wish mine had a non-JPEG setting. My camera's pictures are alway hideously awful quality when I download them from the camera. Luckily, they're also about 6 times the size at which I actually post them, so by the time I shrink them that much, the quality problems are no longer evident. (Shrinking them that much also gives me plenty of leeway to correct the problems caused by my own lack of photography skills, too.)

Reply

rekraft December 21 2006, 17:51:08 UTC
They seemed all right to me... Is there some image resolution setting on your camera that you're perhaps not aware of? Your camera's way newer than mine, so image quality and megapixels really should be the last of your worries.

Reply

queerbychoice December 22 2006, 01:02:33 UTC
Of course they seemed all right to you; you only see them after I've shrunk them to a sixth of their original size! I never show anyone the humongous original versions, both because the quality is awful in the originals and because sending pictures anywhere near that huge via my dialup would be hellish.

I read my camera's instruction manual very carefully, so I'm pretty sure I didn't miss anything. The camera manufacturers just sacrificed a lot of quality for the sake of being able to advertise that their camera could take humongous pictures. Thankfully, shrinking the pictures fixes the quality.

Reply

rekraft December 26 2006, 17:58:46 UTC
Erk, how mouldy. I hate this megapixel pride they've got going... the most high-tech camera I have shoots 3.2 megapixels and it still holds its own against some of the newcomers as long as I don't try to make subway posters out of my shots. Can't say I'm in the habit of reading my camera manuals (not that most of my cameras have manuals anymore, anyway) and there are probably lots of things I'll never find out about them.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up