(no subject)
more more more............
this one looks so much better printed out. i think it looks terrible in this format....
also my negative is apparently dirty. this image looks just muddy to me.
this is kendall (again). i believe this was taken at either age 15 or age 16. not sure. it gets blurred together.
i originally shot this- and it came out all crappy so i reshot it. it came out 100x better-
and eventually won me a golden key among other awards.
this was in my portfolio along with the other image. another instance in which it looks entirely different in digital format.
graininess is the bane of my existence but i like the dynamic quality so it stayed.
ok so these are all kendall obviously.
and all 3 of these make me cringe when digitized.
whatever.
i threw this one in here because look how skinny i was!!!!!
(age 15)
and i wasn't even vegan yet.
this one looks so much better printed out. i think it looks terrible in this format....
also my negative is apparently dirty. this image looks just muddy to me.
this is kendall (again). i believe this was taken at either age 15 or age 16. not sure. it gets blurred together.
i originally shot this- and it came out all crappy so i reshot it. it came out 100x better-
and eventually won me a golden key among other awards.
this was in my portfolio along with the other image. another instance in which it looks entirely different in digital format.
graininess is the bane of my existence but i like the dynamic quality so it stayed.
ok so these are all kendall obviously.
and all 3 of these make me cringe when digitized.
whatever.
i threw this one in here because look how skinny i was!!!!!
(age 15)
and i wasn't even vegan yet.