I had a discussion the other day regarding the nature of religion from a philosophical standpoint. Religion in this case was defined as a belief that something was wrong with the world, or humanity, and that a solution is required. The solution was defined as the religious ultimate.
That is to say for example that for catholics the problem with
(
Read more... )
I find it interesting the way that you're considering atheism from a scientific standpoint- ie science cannot prove the existance of god one way or another, and that is true- there is no clear answer scientific or otherwise. Conversely, I've had people present the exact same arguement to me from the other side. Life is so complex as codified in DNA and subatomic particles, etc that it couldn't /possibly/ be accidental and therefore MUST be divine design. Frankly, I don't understand why people can't just accept that there is no reason but accidental coincidence. I guess that it's fear of mortality and the curiosity of human nature needing to explain their surroundings. It's all just a bunch of bs to me.
So yeah, I read and understood. I just get P/Oed by religion.--///END RANT///-------------------------------
Reply
Leave a comment