Obama's attempt to portray Republicans as anti-science
fails.
But the picture is far more complex than just a line sloping down from President Reagan to President Bush.
Truth is, since peaking in 1964, federal funding on sciences as a percentage of GDP has gone down under every President, Democratic or Republican, except for Ronald Reagan.
I love
(
Read more... )
Comments 46
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Pointing out that your assumptions didn't lock me into the position you wish I held...goes right over your head.
*pats you on said head*
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
In typical "spinmeister" fashion you admit that I'm right:
Of Course the GOP is pro-science when you look at the amount of funding those programs got when adjusted for inflation against the real value pinned to the gold standard
...before furiously spinning so your world view doesn't have to change:
the only thing that matters is how much money you have and can invest!
Clue: yes, that's right, when you compare funding you use...money! *eyeroll*
Reply
(and if anyone REALLY understands that reference, I'll be impressed... and, no... it's not about stem cells)
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Welcome to the killfile!
Reply
Mmm. I guess you know all about diseases, what with the Asperger's and everything. So now you're an expert on all mental illnesses.
ROCK ON!
Reply
Ooh! Ooh! I know the answer! I know the answer!
The sentence starts with "Elfin is undergoing."
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment