Juxtaposition

Nov 07, 2008 20:56

About that "landslide" thing....


Read more... )

2008 election

Leave a comment

Comments 32

jimmy1128 November 8 2008, 02:33:53 UTC
Yeah, on election night I heard "landslide" and said "hu?, when do you call 5 or 6% a landslide"

Reply


aeolianafay November 8 2008, 03:14:11 UTC
I think they're looking at the electorate results and not the popular vote. Which is really silly.

I also think it's interesting how many of the conservatives I know are taking Obama's win a lot better then they did with Bush's win 4 or 8 years ago.

Reply

izuko November 8 2008, 13:52:52 UTC
I still think we should vote by land area.

Reply


solid_silence November 8 2008, 03:27:50 UTC
Why is it Republicans are such poor losers and feel the need to constantly pose false dilemma questions to mischaracterise those who oppose them?

Fortunately that's not actual true - the poor perception and low character of a few does not necessarily reflect on the majority.

Reply

writerspleasure November 8 2008, 04:28:39 UTC
i'd love to see you point out anything factually wrong here.

obama's win in popular votes was statistically milquetoast.

Reply

solid_silence November 8 2008, 04:43:57 UTC
Democrats are never satisfied with a "big win"

[democrats] have to overreach for that "landslide" label

I assume you are aware that these are both unqualified (i.e blanket) statements, which as such are patently untrue.

Reply

izuko November 8 2008, 13:54:09 UTC
It's called communication. We generalize in order to make even the most basic communication possible. Don't like it? Tough shit.

Reply


pogo101 November 8 2008, 04:26:26 UTC
Obama got closer to 53%, but still, 51 vs. 53 is being treated much more differently than it should be, yes.

Reply


psychomatt November 8 2008, 05:52:38 UTC
They're just so thrilled to have managed to win the popular vote, considering Clinton didn't carry the popular vote for either of his terms.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up