"How would so-called homosexual “marriage” hurt traditional marriage, children and families? There are 4 main ways:
1) Marriage is about the next generation. Legal sanction of so-called homosexual “marriage” would always deny children either a mother or a father. A compassionate and loving society always comes to the aid of motherless and fatherless families. It never intentionally creates such families, and yet that is what homosexual “marriage” would do. These types of homosexual families are based on the desires of the adults, not the needs of the children. No child-development theory says children need parents of the same gender, but rather that children need their mothers and fathers.
2) Homosexual “marriage” is a vast, untested social experiment with children. No society, at any time, has ever raised a generation of children in homosexual families. In this instance, children are allowed to become the subject of sociological experiments for the sake of adult sexual desires.
3) If marriage is redefined to include two people of the same gender, where would it stop? How do we say no to group marriage? If marriage is simply about love and commitment, on what basis do we deny group marriage? There are already lawsuits underway challenging the laws that prohibit polygamy on the same grounds as used by homosexual “marriage” proponents. Is it bigotry and discrimination to oppose polygamy and group marriage? Of course not. Just like it is not bigotry or discrimination to protect the traditional and historical institution of marriage as one man and one woman.
4) If so-called homosexual “marriage” is legalized, school children will be taught it is the same as traditional marriage. The people of Wisconsin don’t believe homosexual “marriage” is the same as traditional marriage. Yet if we allow the legalization of so-called homosexual “marriage,” this will happen. There are already books written for small school children, such as Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy’s Roommate and King and King." ~www.savemarriagewi.org
Now the question is, do you delete my post and thus silence my opinion. Or do you leave in my opinion even though it is the direct opposite of yours. Your country gives you the freedom to make your post, do you give me the freedom to make my reply?
Yea, ive read Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy’s Roommate and King and King; they are good books. And already happen to be on the shelves of many public elementry schools. On a different point, i dont believe polygamy is wrong if all parties are consenting to it. Ive been in polyamorous and open relationships without any problems before.
There are 4 main ways:
1) Marriage is about the next generation. Legal sanction of so-called homosexual “marriage” would always deny children either a mother or a father. A compassionate and loving society always comes to the aid of motherless and fatherless families. It never intentionally creates such families, and yet that is what homosexual “marriage” would do. These types of homosexual families are based on the desires of the adults, not the needs of the children. No child-development theory says children need parents of the same gender, but rather that children need their mothers and fathers.
2) Homosexual “marriage” is a vast, untested social experiment with children. No society, at any time, has ever raised a generation of children in homosexual families. In this instance, children are allowed to become the subject of sociological experiments for the sake of adult sexual desires.
3) If marriage is redefined to include two people of the same gender, where would it stop? How do we say no to group marriage? If marriage is simply about love and commitment, on what basis do we deny group marriage? There are already lawsuits underway challenging the laws that prohibit polygamy on the same grounds as used by homosexual “marriage” proponents. Is it bigotry and discrimination to oppose polygamy and group marriage? Of course not. Just like it is not bigotry or discrimination to protect the traditional and historical institution of marriage as one man and one woman.
4) If so-called homosexual “marriage” is legalized, school children will be taught it is the same as traditional marriage. The people of Wisconsin don’t believe homosexual “marriage” is the same as traditional marriage. Yet if we allow the legalization of so-called homosexual “marriage,” this will happen. There are already books written for small school children, such as Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy’s Roommate and King and King."
~www.savemarriagewi.org
Now the question is, do you delete my post and thus silence my opinion. Or do you leave in my opinion even though it is the direct opposite of yours. Your country gives you the freedom to make your post, do you give me the freedom to make my reply?
Reply
On a different point, i dont believe polygamy is wrong if all parties are consenting to it. Ive been in polyamorous and open relationships without any problems before.
~Raven
Reply
Leave a comment