100% interesting, lonely, reciprocating, and absurdly obscure.
So, random_walker, your LiveJournal reveals...
You are... 0% unique and 0% herdlike. When it comes to friends you are lonely. In terms of the way you relate to people, you believe in give and take. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is absurdly obscure.
Your overall weirdness is: 65
(The average level of weirdness is: 28.
You are weirder than 93% of other LJers.)
Find out what your weirdness level is!
I think that a scientific organization like APA should offer a service like this, but which is empirically validated with some notion of measurement of error. This is cute and all, but not only is it closed/hidden-source, it is completely undocumented. What is the difference between "interesting" and "peculiar"? I'm just annoyed that this is a popular realm where at least a little bit of scientific method would be worth a bunch, at least to me.