I completely and totally meant to bother everyone with strange and exciting facts about history (Friday, promise - hold me to it!), but, round 7 of the rainbow book awards is on! (... I missed rounds 1-6 because I am ill-informed).
I mention this because the cover of The Sartorialist is up this month. For those who have not seen it:
(
Read more... )
Once again, where are all the lady queers? I counted, like, 3. /rhetorical question is rhetorical
WTF:
( ... )
Reply
I feel like 'Gay Pride and Prejudice' would have all the artistic integrity of 'Pride and Prejudice and Zombies', and half the entertainment value :/ - that said, I kind of want to read it myself, because I'm not sure I can think of a period in time at which two people who identify as and were raised as male could quite fit in to those character roles. I would like to see if it's just pasted on cocks, or there's actually some fitting in involved.
Reply
Oh wait, all the characters are replaced with men? Boo. I had pictured a lesbian Lizzie. (I haven't read P&P&Z, but I gave Sense & Sensibility & Sea Monsters a try, and couldn't get through it.)
Let me know how Frat Boy and Toppy turns out! I could use a good laugh.
Reply
Reply
And I was so excited when I saw the first cover!
Also: does gay always mean dudes? I mean: I know that's the most likely conclusion. But sometimes girls can be gay, right? /out of the loop. Again.
Reply
I have decided that everything is queer, now. It saves time and fuck people being confused, I'm not their babysitter.
Reply
I'm trying to picture how that story would work with dudes, because as you said: it's hard to imagine men fitting into those roles.
Queer is such an awesome and useful word, and yeah: screw the fact that no two people can agree on what it means! I know what I mean when I use it, and: yeah. It saves time and fuck people being confused, I'm not their babysitter. This! :P
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Also, I didn't mean the observation as a criticism: the contest you're running is fantastic! No, it was just taking note. Having grown up in fandom, I've always marvelled at the popularity of "slash", and now as a writer of f/f romance, I marvel at the popularity of m/m romance over my genre. (Biased? Me? Never!)
Of course, people like what they like, and I am happy to celebrate fiction representing all the GLBTQ flavors. (I will, however, continue to complain that more people should be into what I'm into, dammit! Though perhaps QO would prefer I do it elsewhere... ;)
Reply
Pfft. If I haven't cultivated an environment of rampant hedonism, then I am doing something horribly wrong.
But, y'know, you can always do (a variation of) what my dad keeps telling me to do: just find/replace one of the names to a male one and change the pronouns/equipment around. Then you'll be rich.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment