(Subject is the title of a book by Douglas Adams.)
I hereby raise my bet to 150% short. I hope this turns out to have been a
good idea. Today’s closing price is higher than I would have preferred, but
at least we are still within the lime-green channel. If we hit that ole’
dashed orange line again (or even exceed the lime channel significantly),
this trade is toast and I will need to cancel it at a loss. Right now I’m
sitting on an unrealized imaginary gain of +1.6%, hoping for more.
On
Aug 29
I wrote: “the red line came very close on Aug 25, … so I think I’ll skip the
contrarian trade on the next downswing.” But then on
Sep 07 I wrote,
“Meanwhile, the red line has since fallen away…, so why not trade long
here?” This utterance is my chief contender for “stupidest thing said all
year” and a solid reason for you to always remember that you are
watching 🐔 🪛 ⚾ (The Crank Channel). A quick scan
through recent years (which I could have done at any time) shows that long
trades after falling red lines do not do well. This makes sense: a falling
red line means there have been no new highs in a month, so maybe not a good
time for a bullish bet? If I add a new rule “needs to have been a new high
within the last 22 days before beginning a long trade” then the entire
-14.6% loser trade would have been skipped. What an expensive lesson!
Lawyers: nothing.