camera research

Aug 06, 2005 14:05

Do any of you have digital cameras that don't have viewfinders? If so--do you find that it's really annoying, or that you don't miss your viewfinder at all?

shopping

Leave a comment

purljamber August 7 2005, 19:23:56 UTC
Well, this image was posted in the official description of the DMC-LZ1:



I'd say it's a noticable difference...

Reply

jentwo August 7 2005, 19:47:10 UTC
NICE! I wish I had that, it would make taking close-up shots like that soooo much easier.

Reply

purljamber August 7 2005, 19:57:03 UTC
See why I'm torn? This feature is a big, giant plus...

Reply

jentwo August 7 2005, 20:02:38 UTC
Okay, what does the Canon have that is real competition with the image stabilization then? I think the Panasonic might be your best bet...

Reply

purljamber August 7 2005, 20:07:32 UTC
The Canon is a bit cheaper, has a viewfinder, and has manual shooting controls. It also has audio playback on videos, and I can't determine whether the Panasonic does. I am not sure if manual controls would be that big of a deal, as I'm a pretty lazy picture-taker, and I don't know if the audio playback is that big of a deal either. I'm still hanging on to the viewfinder idea, although I honestly don't know how big of a deal it would be not to have one. I do use mine occasionally, but is it something I can live without?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up