Geppetto is annoyed

Jul 13, 2008 17:45

Abstract art should be used as firewood.

Leave a comment

gruff_goat July 14 2008, 03:07:55 UTC
I wish I understood the appeal. I mean, I can see how the classic guys, like Leonardo got popular. (You know, all the ninja turtles.) And I've seen some historical landscape scenes that are really awesome. Like, those ones that are made up of bits of real places and all put together with dramatic lighting and weather and are really, really huge? There's probably a name for it.

But a painting that doesn't look like anything and is just a big old mess? Or is just squares? Why do people like that? I'm sorry, but if you don't have to have skill to produce it, it's not that interesting. Maybe that's the craftsman in me.

Reply

puppeteeress July 14 2008, 03:29:44 UTC
Ah, someone who finally understands.

A two year old can splatter paint on a canvas and it gets tacked onto a refrigerator. A twenty year old drug addict does the same thing and gets paid thousands. A waste of art supplies, if you ask me.

Reply

undergiass July 19 2008, 03:26:11 UTC
Wherein I find Jackson to be over rated, in his defense, it has been found that all of his finished pieces form mathematical fractals which lends to its completeness regardless of method.

Regardless, I recommend that only bad abstract art be burned. Not all of it.

To say that would be to condemn De Kooning, Johns, and Rauschenberg just as much as contemporary art students.

Reply

puppeteeress July 19 2008, 04:35:27 UTC
I've never had a liking for the form of art, and after spending two weeks looking at it upon my gallery walls, I fear that even the good abstract art will only please me if it is on fire.

This does not mean that next week I won't agree with you.

Reply

undergiass July 19 2008, 03:20:35 UTC
Northern Baroque, Arcadian Pastoralism...mainly French.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up