Feb 12, 2010 11:57
WAG is the most stupid term out there. Seriously. 'Wife and girlfriend' or the same in plural. Whiskey tango foxtrot... why do certain magazines and newspapers keep talking about female humans with that term? WAG? No, it's WOG, one can't be usually both (or at least to the same person). That's just such a retarded term to use that I propose a few additions or modifications to it that don't make any less sense than the original WAG:
* WOG (w or g)
* WAGAWNIR (w and g and women not in relationship)
* WAGAGD (wag and golddiggers)
* WROTRS (women regardless of their relationship status)
* WWURS (women with undisclosed relationship)
* SOIR (spouse or in relationship, either gender)
* HAB (husband and boyfriend)
* HOB (husband or boyfriend)
* WHCG/WSCG (whatever he/she can get)
* TFB (the f-buddy)
* TONS (the one night stand)
* PONS (previous one-night stand)
* EWAG (ex wag)
* EHAB (ex hab)
* NOYB (none of your business)
Seriously, why would any person out there be referred with that horrible WAG status?
The only reasons I can imagine are them being labeled as golddiggers or Mrs Beckham wannabes by the media. Women that are by themselves nothing, and that are attached to the soccer players because they are rich.
So how about starting to label the men of equal category, those who linger like bees around the rich ladies as HAB? HAB Jesus, HAB whatever Kylie's Spanish guy was called, HAB the whatever the other Minogue's guy was called etc.
stupid