Between the end of "Battlestar Galactica" and the recent Classica discussions, I’ve been finding myself discussing and thinking about authorial intent…in terms of romantic arcs, entertainment value, etc. I mentioned before how I had issues with Ron’s reading of Kara in the finale, but then Karen analyzed the thing for me in a way that worked, and I
(
Read more... )
Also, I remember you mentioned that you hated Anna, the character, in another comment? And yet you can see past that hate to understand how the culture actually does have her at a disadvantage in this situation. Most people? Can't see past their like/dislike of a character to see what might be motivating them, and that is sort of reading into the text in different ways.
But that brings us back to women in literature/movies/TV. Did Tolstoy even realize what he had condemned Anna to, or did he just assume that any/every woman would react the same way, regardless of circumstance?
And yes: this is something I wonder about when it comes to authorial intent when reading canon texts. While I can mostly find women to like, there are times when it's impossible. And a lot of the time...you see bits of them that are likable, but you know the writer couldn't have meant it in a positive way, and then there's also a disconnect there in terms of what the author sees and what you're seeing.
Reply
Anyway, it really bugs me when people can't get past their personal opinions about characters and step back to see the work as a whole. Anna bugged the hell out of me for many reasons (I really don't remember most of them - I haven't read it in a long, long time), but that doesn't mean that I automatically blame her for everything that happens to her...just like I wouldn't absolve a character I like from a wrongdoing. What makes these characters interesting is their complexity...
Reply
Leave a comment