That's How...
So, I wondered how Harold Camping would support his "I interpreted wrongly" claim...
well, he came up with 2 bible quotes:
http://www.familyradio.com/x/whathappened.html
All I have to say is WTF?
This is even weaker than most of his writing, note that there's a lot more on the text side of the text-to-quotes ratio of this. Maybe he didn't even write it.
To condense, he says he misinterpreted two words, and earthquake meant "people would be quaking" because god made them out of earth originally. I noticed a distinct lack of quaking from anyone who wasn't convinced Harry was the best bible scholar ever.
Weak, Harold. Weak. I was expecting something a little more tenuous with a bigger helping of obfuscation. I'm really sorry you had that stroke and it's limiting you in this way. Stick around, buddy; you still have to explain the metaphorical end of the world on October 22nd!
well, he came up with 2 bible quotes:
http://www.familyradio.com/x/whathappened.html
All I have to say is WTF?
This is even weaker than most of his writing, note that there's a lot more on the text side of the text-to-quotes ratio of this. Maybe he didn't even write it.
To condense, he says he misinterpreted two words, and earthquake meant "people would be quaking" because god made them out of earth originally. I noticed a distinct lack of quaking from anyone who wasn't convinced Harry was the best bible scholar ever.
Weak, Harold. Weak. I was expecting something a little more tenuous with a bigger helping of obfuscation. I'm really sorry you had that stroke and it's limiting you in this way. Stick around, buddy; you still have to explain the metaphorical end of the world on October 22nd!