(no subject)
posted 15 October, 1:41a:IF YOURE RELATED TO ME ITS OKAY TO SKIP THIS ONE.
more sodomology theory.
so sex is a function of peramutation.
there are only so many erogenous zones and methods of stimulation, or to quote Doug Stanhope "only so many holes and parts"
so given every combination of those, there are then only so many positions in which these combinations are practical without training or an amount of practice bordering on obsession.
so, while the number is astronomically high, there is a finite number of ways to have sex.
now, like most people im sure, i have a list of things that either dont appeal to me, or arent sexually interesting. so i wouldnt perform said acts, unless of course i wasnt repulsed personally and it would stimulate the other person somehow.
so, the list becomes shortened a bit, but it is still a very large number of items on said list.
if one were given the means to have sex nearly continuously, barring need for food, rest, water, and time to heal of various sexual injuries, it still becomes unlikely one will accomplish everything on their own personal list, particularly given the fact that their partner or partners will invariably have different lists and some repetition is inevitable.
so; if sex is a finite but large number, and the number of times one can have sex in optimum conditions is also a finite number but not one nearly so astronomical, there is a very real possibility one will miss the very best part of sex.
does anyone else ever worry about that?
more sodomology theory.
so sex is a function of peramutation.
there are only so many erogenous zones and methods of stimulation, or to quote Doug Stanhope "only so many holes and parts"
so given every combination of those, there are then only so many positions in which these combinations are practical without training or an amount of practice bordering on obsession.
so, while the number is astronomically high, there is a finite number of ways to have sex.
now, like most people im sure, i have a list of things that either dont appeal to me, or arent sexually interesting. so i wouldnt perform said acts, unless of course i wasnt repulsed personally and it would stimulate the other person somehow.
so, the list becomes shortened a bit, but it is still a very large number of items on said list.
if one were given the means to have sex nearly continuously, barring need for food, rest, water, and time to heal of various sexual injuries, it still becomes unlikely one will accomplish everything on their own personal list, particularly given the fact that their partner or partners will invariably have different lists and some repetition is inevitable.
so; if sex is a finite but large number, and the number of times one can have sex in optimum conditions is also a finite number but not one nearly so astronomical, there is a very real possibility one will miss the very best part of sex.
does anyone else ever worry about that?