Неоднозначно. Вообще, всё это мало похоже на вердикт.
When Mr Lugovoy poisoned Mr Litvinenko (as I have found that he did), it is probable that he did so under the direction of the FSB. I would add that I regard that as a strong probability. I have found that Mr Kovtun also took part in the poisoning; I conclude therefore that he was also acting under FSB direction, possibly indirectly through Mr Lugovoy but probably to his knowledge.
Ну, так это и не вердикт в классическом понимании. Это результаты публичного расследования. И этот доклад надо читать целиком. Классическая процедура пока невозможна, так как РФ отказалась сотрудничать и выдавать подозреваемых.
Comments 16
Reply
Reply
Reply
Так что реагировать GB как-то придется - интересно, что они теперь будут делать.
Reply
When Mr Lugovoy poisoned Mr Litvinenko (as I have found that he did), it is probable that he did so under the direction of the FSB. I would add that I regard that as a strong probability. I have found that Mr Kovtun also took part in the poisoning; I conclude therefore that he was also acting under FSB direction, possibly indirectly through Mr Lugovoy but probably to his knowledge.
Reply
А в самом заявлении, цитата из которого приведена в начале поста, в отношении ФСБ все однозначно. Вот на него ссылка: https://www.litvinenkoinquiry.org/files/lit210116.pdf
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment