Thanks to padawanpooh for sharing the love - this was fun, even if it obviously can't be taken too seriously. (her experiment with pasting in a bit of Dickens, which was declared to be much like Asimov was rather telling, *snicker
( Read more... )
Interesting - I wonder what it is keying into? It isn't random - I tried going in and popping in bits from all over one long story and got a mix of two authors consistently (Twain if it was dialogue, Nabokov if it was descriptive)... I've only read one King novel, so my exposure to his style is vague at best. What piece did you put in?
Likewise! That's the only novel he had that didn't look too creepy for my rather vivid imagination to handle. It was excellent, but it's been too many years since I picked it up to recall the elements that made it what it was.
I just read the wiki page for Mr. Nabokov and their mention of his use of both word play and colors makes it make sense to me as I take those elements into account with any passages that run poetic and/or descriptive (though I'm sure not to his apparent level - he was one of those people who saw emotions, etc. as colors, wow...) It must have been picking up on all the emotional/color/texture references.
And Wodehouse! Woot for Wooster and co., one of my very faves, you are well complimented indeed by that one.
I couldn't get Tolkien, no matter what I tried! Even when I used a passage that used Boromir's name, I got Stephen King. *sigh* Guess I don't mind being compared to him, though...
I wondered if it was keying into his character names - apparently it wasn't the telling ingredient... Mr. King has quite a following, though, in great part, I've been told, because he is "so readable" - certainly your work is that, and nicely done as well. :-) *pats Lin's writing in admiration*
Comments 23
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Wow, Tolkien and Twain! It is definitely not random, they nailed it. I haven't read Nabakov in 20 years, so I can't really speak to that, lol.
I have only red King's "Eye of the Dragon" which was good, but I don't remember the style particularly.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I played with this a bit, but it seemed very arbitrary. I did like the one where I got a comparison to P.G. Wodehouse! :)
Reply
And Wodehouse! Woot for Wooster and co., one of my very faves, you are well complimented indeed by that one.
Reply
Reply
*pats Lin's writing in admiration*
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment