(Untitled)

Apr 24, 2009 09:58

I've fallen madly in love with this scarf and have decided I need desperately to make it. The problem is, I don't really know where and how to start. As generous as the designer is with her posting of the charts for the letters, she doesn't give a pattern for the scarf as a whole. So, knitters on my flist, I need your help ( Read more... )

knitting, flist is awesome

Leave a comment

newleaf31 April 24 2009, 17:03:02 UTC
O_O! Well, I'm just dead over this, and I love you for posting it. ♥ Will start on this ASAP.

I can't give you better instructions than alexisyael's. Two bits of advice ( ... )

Reply

newleaf31 April 24 2009, 17:06:12 UTC
Oh, and about the intarsia/stranded knitting question -- I think, at least for me, stranded makes more sense in this case. None of the distances between color changes is more than 5 stitches, it looks like, and stranded knitting can easily take that. I hate keeping up with all the little mini-skeins you need for intarsia unless I'm doing a whole big block of color. Just me, though.

Reply

primroseburrows April 24 2009, 23:11:13 UTC
I'd much rather do stranded than intarsia, because I've done stranded and it's not nearly as futzy as intarsia looks like it would be. I agree with you about the mini-skeins. I HATE futzy. Now I just need to figure out how much/what weight of yarn and needle size and I'll be able to pick out colours. I'm thinking worsted/aran. Hmm...

And whee! You're going to make this? Ooh.

Reply

newleaf31 April 24 2009, 23:33:46 UTC
The yarn weight sort of depends on how long you want it to be. If you're like me and you like a scarf that you can actually wrap around your neck and still have long ends, I'd go with worsted-weight yarn. I'm thinking about using Patons Classic Merino, which is inexpensive but reliable wool available at Michael's or JoAnn's craft stores. I think two skeins of grey and two of black would PROBABLY be sufficient, and while you might only need one of red, I'd get two just to be sure. But if you'd like your scarf to be a little finer -- more like something you'd buy in a shop rather than something handmade -- you could do it in DK-weight yarn. You can get some really nice, relatively inexpensive DK-weight at www.knitpicks.com. Not sure how much to advise for that, though.

Reply

newleaf31 April 24 2009, 23:46:49 UTC
Oops, and needles: If you go with worsted-weight, I'd recommend US 8 or 9, and I'd use circular ones that are at least 26" long, because you're knitting the scarf lengthwise. Straight needles won't be long enough to hold all those stitches. If you go with DK-weight, I'd shoot for US 6 circulars. It all depends on how tight you knit, but the label of your yarn should recommend an appropriate size of needle for the thickness of the yarn.

Reply

primroseburrows April 24 2009, 23:47:41 UTC
This scarf is as long as the quote, so it has a finite size. I thought about DK, too, because it would be lighter, especially if I end up making a back. I have to do a bunch of calculations to figure out how long it is. My Google-fu is failing at finding anyone actually making this scarf, so I'll have to figure it out with a calculator. Grr.

I'll want a yarn that's washable, probably, so a superwash Merino or something like that (which I'm not sure is available in DK, but I'll check).

I'd rather have extra than not enough, so I'll probably go with two skeins of each if I can't figure it out specifically.

Reply

newleaf31 April 25 2009, 00:21:06 UTC
Well, of course the PATTERN has a finite size based on the length of the quote. But the thickness of your yarn also makes a big difference (as does the needle size). This pattern knit in DK will probably be at least five or six inches shorter than this pattern knit in worsted. Standard length for a scarf is 70". The picture looks like worsted to me. You can find superwash merinos in DK, but it's difficult; you might opt for an acrylic blend if you're looking for something affordable. Hard to find a lot of natural fibers that are machine-washable.

Reply

primroseburrows April 25 2009, 03:20:56 UTC
Hmm. Then I probably will do the worsted. Because it should be longer, I think.

Reply

alexisyael April 24 2009, 18:51:47 UTC
haha, your advice was TONS better than mine! AND I forgot to use my pretty knitting icon, so here it is :D

Reply

primroseburrows April 24 2009, 23:12:36 UTC
Next on list: Make knitting icon. I use my Waldorf icon (*points*), which works, but a knit-specific one would be fun to make. When, y'know, I don't have to stand up every couple of minutes.

Reply

primroseburrows April 24 2009, 23:06:11 UTC
A border is a great idea, especially since I'd have to make a back for it also, and I'd need room for stitching.

I've read charts before, so I know the basics, but working from them doesn't come easy for me because I've got some weird spatial thing that either has something to do with my ADD or with my math LD (which is actually an arithmetic LD--actually DIAGNOSED, so whee! I suck at math for a reason!). It's related to finding things on a list--I can do it, I just have to work harder and pay a LOT of attention. I'm thinking a magnetic row guide would be a really good idea..

I'm notorious for NOT finishing things, but if I start this, I'm damn well going to try like crazy to finish it because it would be entirely unpatriotic to abandon the project. *waves flag*

Reply

newleaf31 April 24 2009, 23:40:49 UTC
How come you want to make a back for it, if I might ask? Stranded knitting is annoying in that it's not reversible, but so cool on the front side that it's worth it. Fair warning: stitching (with thread and fabric) on knitting is a HUGE PAIN IN THE ASS. I did it with a wrap I made my mom for Christmas a couple of years ago and it made me throw things.

I'm notorious for not finishing stuff, too, even knitting projects. So if you want, we can keep each other accountable! :)

Reply

primroseburrows April 24 2009, 23:49:39 UTC
I figure a back would cover up the work on the reverse side. Hmm. I do not want to throw things.

Mutual accountability sounds like a great idea. Accountability is the trend, after all. :)

Reply

newleaf31 April 25 2009, 19:49:24 UTC
So I's been thinkin' about this scarf some more, and here is a thing you can do if you want all the strings of the stranded knitting to be not so visible. Assuming you're knitting it the lengthwise (you can knit it shortwise, but that really will require intarsia instead of stranded), just knit it twice as wide. What I mean is, at quick count, I think the pattern's 53 lines wide. So knit 27 rows in your main color, black, knit the chart, then knit 26 more rows in black. Seam up the cast-on/cast-off edges inside out, turn it right side out, and seam up the short ends. Voila, strands are inside and invisible! Added bonus: you don't have to do the border I talked about above, because the seams will prevent the scarf from rolling up.

Reply

primroseburrows April 25 2009, 21:16:12 UTC
So that means the seam would be in the middle of the back? Hmmm...might work.

Also, I bought yarn! I haven't uploaded the picture yet, but it'll be going in my next post. It's a cotton-merino blend. Pretty and soft!

Reply

newleaf31 April 25 2009, 21:44:36 UTC
If you seam it properly (with a kitchener stitch), the seam should be largely invisible. Even if it wasn't, no one should see it anyway. Your alternative would be to seam it at an edge.

I got my yarn, too. I thought about organic cotton, but can't afford it right now. I did go with merino, in dark brown, off-white, and a brownish-pink heather called "woodrose." Very pretty.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up