(Untitled)

Nov 26, 2003 14:43

Icon! Who wants it?


Read more... )

0 - wank

Leave a comment

anonymous November 26 2003, 22:10:40 UTC
NICE PICTURE OF YOURSELF POTTERSUES

Reply

kittytribal November 26 2003, 22:12:36 UTC
Sadly, from your discription, I thought that was you on a good day. Wow, How mistaken!

*sarcasim is good for the soul

Reply

pottersues November 26 2003, 22:12:56 UTC
With apologies to zannechaos:


... )

Reply

lycoris November 26 2003, 22:43:15 UTC
That completley and totally sums up EVERYONE'S view of this. It's also very cool! ^_^

Reply

kuchenhexe November 26 2003, 23:49:10 UTC
I feel so pleased! ::giggling:: Such a perfect retort for the moment.

Reply

waysmeanstonola November 26 2003, 22:26:35 UTC
i agree- it looks like all the mary sues when they bitch about being criticized.

Reply

prettyamyrose November 26 2003, 22:34:06 UTC
Well, I'm not very active in PotterSues, but... that does look like me in the morning before I get my coffee. ^-^

Reply

eljuno November 26 2003, 22:53:20 UTC
Hmm...

Nope, that's more like my boss. Nice try, though.

Reply

thesurvivalist November 26 2003, 22:54:31 UTC
M'dear, I believe you're the one who talks in all capitals.

Reply

terminal_frost November 26 2003, 23:06:12 UTC
Apparently my suggestion to lay off the sugar went unheeded...

*snerk*

Reply

mhari November 27 2003, 00:04:06 UTC
Because, as we all know, ugly people are mean and mean people are ugly. *giggles*

Reply

shortiefromhell November 27 2003, 00:09:04 UTC
But... wouldn't that contradict Snacky's Law?

Reply

minttown1 November 27 2003, 01:44:37 UTC
That actually does seem to be a recurring theme in Harry Potter, though.

Reply

gehayi November 27 2003, 02:09:50 UTC
I'm rather tired of it as a theme, too. I hope that in the next book, Rowling has ( ... )

Reply

kragey November 27 2003, 02:33:28 UTC
4. The elimination of the perception that Hufflepuff is the house that's the dumping ground for the people who aren't highly intelligent, brave, or ambitious. Hufflepuffs are supposed to be hard-working, just, true and loyal. These are not bad qualities. They are just not glamorous ones.

EXACTLY! It gets me so cheesed when everybody acts like Hufflepuffs are nothing. T_T

Reply

jean_prouvaire November 27 2003, 04:11:43 UTC
2. At least one homely, non-evil, non-Slytherin character who is likeable. I am tired of Rowling equating physical ugliness with moral corruption. That stereotype is embedded deeply enough in our society and she doesn't have to reinforce it.

Rowling doesn't always equate physical ugliness with evil. Her coolest characters aren't described as being attractive--Neville is described as being homely and plump, and he's a really kickass character. Hermione has buck teeth and frizzy hair. Ron has a big nose. Harry's short and scrawny. They're not ugly, but they're not Sueishly attractive. And the ones who are attractive tend to be bitchy and/or annoying. (*cough* Cho and Fleur! *cough*)

And she did describe Tom Riddle as being decidedly good-looking. I think his ugliness as Voldemort is more of a symbol of the transformation he went through--a symbol of the ugliness of his soul, maybe.

3. At least one actively evil, good-looking Gryffindor. Gryffindor shouldn't always get to be "the good house," and since the fans are so determined to ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up