4158 - Adventures At Echowick - Licaria Romana and company

Nov 03, 2017 21:35

Title: Adventures At Echowick
Perpetrator: TheDoctor36
Sue-O-Meter: Toxic (I debated giving this just an awful rating, but decided to give this a second, closer look over. When a writer thinks Young Frankenstein’s sexual content which is implied needs to be censored, something is seriously wrong.
Cover/Banner Art:
Summary: “Licaria Romana is going ( Read more... )

pw - woobie/cry for me, o - pepper jack cheese, rating - toxic, pc - b swanitis, p - not fanfic and/or crossover, e - american, p - sue what plot? swp, om - muggle film/multimedia

Leave a comment

auregan November 5 2017, 00:44:39 UTC
Naomi is the Sue's mother. She is a muggle and is a psychologist who teaches courses at a university. The author actually has her saying that an introductory to psychology class isn't real psychology that gets into depth, and that she mocks the students who think it is real psychology.

I am not too sure what to think about this story. It just seems to be more of an original as opposed to a Harry Potter fanfiction. I think that the writer seems to be under the impression that if they use a little bit of the canon that it is fanfiction, but there is nothing really Harry Potterish about this fic... it's just the author showing how great their original character is.

It really annoys me when this OC's father refers to the magical community as 'The Society'. That name implies that it is a bad world to be part of, and the father's anti-magic sentiment just makes me a little confused...

This is a confusing story. I don't think we really get to know the original character the way that the writer thinks we do. I mean, despite the fact that she is a main character, the writer doesn't write her in depth like Harry is.

I'll continue reading, but I am not sure I will continue on with it.

Reply

pottersues November 5 2017, 04:10:32 UTC
Cripes. Not only does that throw out the Sue's blood purity, but I'd missed that part. If anything, she's not the one being bullied, she is the bully!

Reply

darth_gojira November 6 2017, 18:56:47 UTC
Wow! So for psychology you have to go in depth on your first class?! Geez, imagine if math students had that mentality

Reply

yemi_hikari November 7 2017, 21:53:42 UTC
Particularly for a psychology class aimed at the non-college age levels. Why they're teaching psychology though to the lower grades honestly baffles me just as much as this idea that a basic psych class wouldn't cover the basics in psychology before going into depth. You can't teach the more complex stuff until you get the basics down.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up