v-day is almost upon us!

Jan 31, 2005 19:06

so i noticed that valentines day is almost here(fuck you hallmark), and yet again i'm single. what ever shall i do? i can't decide if i want to have a party to celebrate being single, which means all my non-single friends can't be invited. or maybe just having a party for everyone. or drinking myself into oblivion ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Re: now i'm pissed, boy. incitor February 1 2005, 02:54:56 UTC
i think skip's idea has merit. why the fuck ruin an otherwise good party by allowing people who are in relationships to show up? they get their exclusivity, where's ours? people who don't want to be single can be hurt by reminders of their status, especially on a day like valentine's.

while there is an increasing quasi-philosophical movement in America which claims that people should be perfectly comfortable being single, i've yet to see any science based explanation for it. for that matter, i've yet to see the benefits of this quasi-philosophy; except of course it's terribly pleasant not having to deal with someone's shit. still...women are a small price to pay to have sex with them.

as long as they insist on existing, i will insist on both hating and adoring them. waving a bottle of Aquafina in front of a man dying of thirst is wrong, even when it's a natural product of one's existence. it is wrong, not in a moral sense, although it can be, but mostly in the sense that it wrongs the one whose thirst cannot be slaked. the left of the argument is that by waving the bottle in front of his face, he knows for certain that Aquafina exists, and maybe someday he'll get a bottle for himself.

women torture the unwilling single man. perhaps the other way around too. watching happy couples being happy couples is decidedly unpleasant when one feels loneliest. let skip have his party and enjoy it. he's a man starving, dying of thirst, surrounded by people carrying bottled water and tasty treats; and he's increasingly not even allowed to ask for a drink or a morsel of food, by a society that is trying to tell him everything is just fine.

well perhaps for us, everything is NOT fine. perhaps we want some answers, and failing that we want the chance to be pissed off without being judged for it by those who aren't in our position.

Reply

Re: now i'm pissed, boy. watchbradford February 2 2005, 00:05:59 UTC
again, crap. i can share water if i have it. i CANNOT share a relationship. shitty analogy, dave.

i am a decent person in a relationship. so fucking what. if boy and i are with people, we switch to friend mode. but i forgot that you count lj. so here's my solution (part of which you already took care of when you decided i was too fucking happy for you to handle). i'm about to drop people from my list so i don't offend anyone else. i wouldn't want to offend.

Reply

tsk tsk incitor February 2 2005, 03:23:59 UTC
The analogy is based upon need, not upon sharing and is therefore valid. It is perfectly possible to die of thirst surrounded by people with water. Rare, yes. Unlikely, yes.

Also, here in 'Frisco there are certainly people who share relationships, although I did not count them in my calculus as I have no interest in polyamory.

You are a decent person in a relationship. Yes, that's true. But irrelevant. No one has claimed you weren't decent. "Boy" and you may indeed switch to "friend mode" but I would have you consider two facts: a) your idea of "friend mode" may not work for the singles around you. b) the singles will still know of your relationship.

Dropping me from your friends list does not hurt my feelings, it will not cause me to change my thoughts or expression. It proves nothing. My best friend wasn't on my friends list for three years because I didn't feel his stuff meshed with mine at the time. Conversely, I still love and care for you, despite having removed you from my friends list.

You chose to take my post personally, rather than seeing it as being a somewhat tongue in cheek rant in support of skip's vague concept of a singles party. Nowhere did I ad hom you Ck, because I love you. I love you even as you choose to air out our personal business in a third party's journal. I can't recall a time that you've offended me. You've disagreed with me, and that's fine, even good. I am disagreeing with you in a small way now, I did so using my bitter-humor voice, and you snapped. Why?

I am disagreeing with you sir! In America we have the right to disagree!

Regardless, I am your friend. You may acknowledge that or not as you choose.

Reply

Re: tsk tsk watchbradford February 2 2005, 13:12:37 UTC
what set me off was less what you said and more of the fact that i'm sick of bullshit. if i cannot be myself around my friends because my happiness makes them uncomfortable, then i guess they weren't such great friends. this party idea is just the icing on the cake for that.

Reply

Re: tsk tsk incitor February 2 2005, 19:24:02 UTC
i would say you're applying alot more to this than actually belongs. but frankly, i'm bored with this whole thing. so you can do what you need to, and i'll remain silent from here on.

Reply

Re: tsk tsk watchbradford February 2 2005, 23:11:45 UTC
as far as i was concerned, it was done after i said my bit last night. so it's done.

Reply

Re: tsk tsk positronik February 2 2005, 23:28:34 UTC
damnit courtney! my entry had nothing...and i mean nothing to do with you. my friends being happy makes me very happy whatever the means of they're happiness. your overreacting to something of nul value, if anything i was bitching about the comercialism surrounding valentines day. there are many reasons i'm single, and i'm a big part of it.

about the party....i was just considering it, not actually planning it. if you remember, you've been to atleast one of my v-day parties. now, i couldn't have a party if i wanted to, no money.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up