From
james_nicoll's journal I note that the Libertarians are out finding targets for the Hall of Fame award.
http://www.lfs.org/2009HoFFinalists.html This year, both Kipling and Tolkien are in. (It's the Libertarian Futurist Society, to be specific. Tolkien and Kipling!You vaguely feel
(
Read more... )
Tolkien is also pretty clear that the Lords of the West bred with weaker people and the pure blood lines thus fail. The racist and bloodline supremacy theme isn't ambigous as much as it is made slightly more complex by additional material, but we're still seeing an overwhelming theme of blood-logic, nobility and their unquestioned right to rule, racial purity and all sorts of reactionary-conservative issues. The entire setting is reactionary-romantic.
The thing here is that Tolkien by any sensible read isn't libertarian, socialist nor progressive, even though you can find minor things which can be read as libertarian, socialist or progressive. But it is silly. One has to look at the big picture. Sure, Samwise becomes mayor from humble beginnings - that doesn't make it a progressive novel - and Eowyn has a sword - that doesn't make it a feminist novel - and there is an anti-totalitarian theme about the corruption of Very Great Power (if not by a royal crown itself) - that doesn't make it a libertarian novel.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment