Leave a comment

madam_shapo July 19 2018, 05:10:39 UTC
Thanks God, the attacks missed me. I hope, nobody else was wounded.

Reply

rose_cat July 19 2018, 08:53:38 UTC
Oh, so do I! The Bowling Green Massacre was terrible, also.

Reply

madam_shapo July 19 2018, 15:33:28 UTC
Did the attack do any damage whatsoever? The Bowling Green Massacre was launched by Russians too?

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 21 2018, 01:18:10 UTC
The fact that you can ask if a cyberattack on our elections “did any damage” pretty much says it all.

ETA: Your journal is written partially in Cyrillic, so I hope you’re at least getting paid to troll this hard.

Reply

madam_shapo July 21 2018, 01:39:34 UTC
Calm down and stop insulting without any basis. Is that too much to ask? Yes, it is.
According to your logic, anybody who can read Russian, Bulgarian, Ukrainian, Bosnian, Macedonian, etc. is getting paid to troll? How stupid is that?

Did I give you permission to look at my journal? There is a description how to make novichok and I don't want you know that.

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 21 2018, 02:03:03 UTC
First, it was a joke and it must have gone right over your head.

Second, I don’t need permission to look at your public posts. That’s what “public” means.

Reply

madam_shapo July 21 2018, 02:13:21 UTC
I have to admit, I didn't realize it was a joke.
Yes, you can do it without my permission, but it is not polite. I want to look at yours, but I won't do it, until you tell me it's ok.
So, let's get back, what was the 'attack' you were talking about?

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 21 2018, 03:47:45 UTC
We’re going to have to agree to disagree over whether or not it’s polite to look at your public postings. You can look at my journal, IDC. You’ll mostly see pictures of my dogs, so prepare yourself to be overwhelmed by the sheer amount of adorable fluff. Anything I’m worried about, I have friends-locked ( ... )

Reply

madam_shapo July 21 2018, 04:08:18 UTC
Ok, I agree to disagree about politeness-not so important.
You know, I hate when somebody asked a question refers to something on internet. Call me old fashioned, but the phrase "google it" triggers, I consider that an ignorance-you know something or you don't. But that's just me.
So, I would rather love you tell me about the attacks-I wan tot know your opinion not somebody else, I want to have a discussion with you, not with a website. Does it make any sense to you?

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 23 2018, 18:51:26 UTC
Sorry I’m just now getting back to you, but I had a really full weekend...

OKay, to be fair, I didn’t tell you “to Google it”. I brought you a variety of resources to read up on the case against Trump. It involves multiple people and has a lot of legal documents involved, so I hope you understand if I don’t feel like it’s my job to educate you on stuff that’s publicly available, especially when I point out out to you.

If you want to know my opinion, my opinion is that you don’t have four former key advisors charged (Gates, Manafort, Papadoupolos, and Flynn) and another under suspicion (Page) unless you’ve been doing the same thing. Does that make sense to you?

Reply

madam_shapo July 24 2018, 03:30:01 UTC
I had a really full weekend...Good for you, I hope you enjoyed it ( ... )

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 24 2018, 03:56:40 UTC
My weekend... Not really. I had class and helped someone move. But you gotta do what you gotta do.

I understand you brought out supposedly serious sources, but unfortunately, the media weren't on their highest for awhile now.
...Which is why I supplied such a wide variety of sources. But if you’re going to start claiming everything but FOX news is fake then this conversation is over, especially because these articles were backed up by real convictions, real plea deals, and real released official government documents.

What you said, would make sense to me, except you should analyze what they were charged for.
So let’s get this straight: You’re claiming it’s TOTALLY NORMAL for a presidential candidate to have five advisors lie about their dealings with another world power? If so, name one. I’ll be waiting.

The only victims here are the ones buying what you’re selling, and honey, that ain’t me.


... )

Reply

madam_shapo July 24 2018, 04:30:28 UTC
By the way, I consider Fox pretty much fake news too.

Dealings? Isn't that a little strong of a word?
Did you know that Hillary had secret meetings with Putin? Why she was hiding it?
You want me name a politician who lied, don't be ridiculous-name one who didn't.

As side issue, do you know how propaganda works?
What makes you think that I am selling anything?

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 24 2018, 04:39:39 UTC
Blah, blah, blah...

In other words, you can’t name one single other presidential candidate that has had five key advisors admit to lying under oath about their dealings with a foreign power. And no, that’s not a strong word. They weren’t playing checkers, FFS.

Now you’re talking about politicians lying, which has nothing to do with this conversation. Stop trying to change the goal posts. We’re talking about five specific advisors to one candidate, one of which he’d known for 20+ years, all having secret dealings with the same hostile foreign power. Dealings they later lied about in order to hide. Not to mention the recent Trump/Putin summit, which he refused to allow witnesses to, as if he also had something to hide. This shit is really transparent to anyone who isn’t willfully stupid.

You seem really wrapped up in the politics of a foreign country. Why is that?

Reply

madam_shapo July 24 2018, 04:42:58 UTC
I just named you one - candidate herself.

Reply

malice_n_wonder July 24 2018, 05:04:41 UTC
No, Hillary Clinton did not have FIVE key advisors admit to lying under oath about their dealings with a foreign power. Try another scapegoat or produce proof, comrade.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up