You did indeed, in another thread elsewhere in this community. You said there was no budget surplus at the end of Clinton's term. That's why Bush doesn't count; because he obliterated the first budget surplus in 40 years.
Once again, Bush doesn't count because in two years he managed to obliterate the first budget SURPLUS in 40 years. A SURPLUS created by a Democrat, something no Republican has been able to do. In a previous dust-up between you and me, you denied that such a surplus even existed.
Even assuming all your premises are 100% true, you're trying to claim that "a tax increase that causes a budget surplus" does not "cause a budget surplus"?
Yay! I don't have to do the research after all. You're still full of shit, as your cited thread proves. As far as apologizing is concerned, fuck you very much, Jeff.
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Notice how Bush took the budget SURPLUS (which you denied even existed) and obliterated it in your first graph.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Oh, I will, Jeff, you can count on it. It'll take some time to go through all our dust-ups, but I'll prove it to you.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Even assuming all your premises are 100% true, you're trying to claim that "a tax increase that causes a budget surplus" does not "cause a budget surplus"?
Do you listen to yourself?
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment