(Untitled)

Aug 07, 2014 13:01


Read more... )

democrats, clinton, obama, defecit

Leave a comment

(The comment has been removed)

(The comment has been removed)

deborahkla August 7 2014, 20:37:08 UTC
You said i wasn't true that Obama had shrunk the deficit. Read the CBO numbers and weep, Jeff.

Notice how Bush took the budget SURPLUS (which you denied even existed) and obliterated it in your first graph.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

deborahkla August 7 2014, 20:51:18 UTC
You did indeed, in another thread elsewhere in this community. You said there was no budget surplus at the end of Clinton's term. That's why Bush doesn't count; because he obliterated the first budget surplus in 40 years.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

(The comment has been removed)

deborahkla August 7 2014, 20:54:28 UTC
Once again, Bush doesn't count because in two years he managed to obliterate the first budget SURPLUS in 40 years. A SURPLUS created by a Democrat, something no Republican has been able to do. In a previous dust-up between you and me, you denied that such a surplus even existed.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

deborahkla August 7 2014, 21:28:49 UTC
Again, prove it.

Oh, I will, Jeff, you can count on it. It'll take some time to go through all our dust-ups, but I'll prove it to you.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

theweaselking August 8 2014, 02:03:41 UTC
Wait, wait.

Even assuming all your premises are 100% true, you're trying to claim that "a tax increase that causes a budget surplus" does not "cause a budget surplus"?

Do you listen to yourself?

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

deborahkla August 8 2014, 20:20:57 UTC
You're full of shit if you think revenues have nothing to do with surpluses and deficits.

Reply

deborahkla August 8 2014, 20:35:30 UTC
Yay! I don't have to do the research after all. You're still full of shit, as your cited thread proves. As far as apologizing is concerned, fuck you very much, Jeff.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up