The economic dynamic of work

[syndicalist]

Comments

[the_hamburglar]

Lemme see, upkeep of machines, advertisements, etc. etc. what other cost can we throw associated with running a business?

[the_hamburglar]

Depends, do you have to out-source or not? They make this shit so cut and dry like it's really this simple.

[syndicalist]

Who does it when it's out-sourced?

[the_hamburglar]

Other businesses, who also have their own associated cost of doing business.

[syndicalist]

Yes, workers in other businesses. In which case, see above cartoon about the creation of a product.

[the_hamburglar]

Yes, but this cartoon assumes that a product worth 100 dollars that he pays his employees only 25 dollars is all profit in his pocket, when in reality he probably sees 45-50 after all over-head cost, taxes, and other shit he has to pay for.

[syndicalist]

Okay, so the owner pays other expenses, also with the money his workers make for him.

[the_hamburglar]

When you find someone willing to start a business by giving all of his profits to his employees let me know, this comic is a fallacy.

[syndicalist]

There are a lot (but too few) organizations that have equal revenue sharing from the start, with everyone a joint owner.

let me know

Okay, done.

[the_hamburglar]

Yeah, that's some good examples you got there.

[syndicalist]

Okay, so it's against the laws of nature for people to equally pool their resources and start a project with equal shares and decision-making power. It would be akin to violating the law of gravity, I suppose.

[the_hamburglar]

That's a good example too.

[syndicalist]

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/more_american_workers_outsourcing?utm_source=videoembed

[xforge]

yabbut who PAYS for all that? (debilz advakit)

[schnoozles]

get that yabbut