No, there are people who I disagree with on a myriad of issues who I nevertheless consider to be relatively intelligent people. Palin supporters, however, are just idiots. There is nothing redeeming about this woman. Almost everything about her is fake, designed to create this Anchorage Barbie persona, and the stuff that's real is even scarier than the fake stuff. There are only two reasons to support her, either you're in on the scam and stand to make money off of it or you're one of the morons who bought the act. There's no other option.
We're only afraid of her in the sense that we'd be afraid of a monkey with a fully loaded M16 or a giraffe with a long range nuclear tipped ballistic missile. She's a moron and yet she was really close to attaining a level of power that would have allowed her to launch nuclear war. That is very scary. We're not scared of her political skills or her magnificent intellect if that's what you're suggesting.
I hope stepping down does derail her chances in the future, that would be best for the country and the world. Let's not get confused however on her reasons. She didn't step down to spare the state, or her family, the trouble. If she cared about the state or her family she wouldn't have done what she did in the first place. She can't trot her family out for 4 months like props in her electoral act and then whine about how the ethics charges are hurting her family.
I didn't "sidestep" your question. I answered your questions. Here it is for the slow Palin supporter. I said, of course I don't believe that. I largely dismissed your "questions" because they weren't phrased in a way that made me feel you were sincere and since I never came close to saying what you claimed I said, I rightly figured you were just being intentionally obtuse. But to answer your questions:
Q: I am curious. Do you honestly believe that all the Americans who disagree with the health care proposals are simply thugs and have no valid concerns? A: Of course not. I do feel however that nobody on the wrong side of this has come forward and offered a single idea on how to fix the system. They seem content to maintain the status quo which just can't happen. I also think that those with valid concerns are allowing themselves to be drowned out by the thugs and Glen Becks of the world.
Q: Is this how you feel about anyone who disagrees with anything Obama and his administration are doing, or does this "thug" characterization only apply to the opponents of Obama's healthcare? A: Again, of course not, though the discourse on that side has been so poisoned by the lies put forth by your hero Palin and Glen Beck that it's almost impossible to debate anyone on your side without getting accused of trying to steal old people's teeth.
Q: Do you believe that the nearly half of the country who didn't happen to vote for Obama are not entitled to responsive representative government? A: They have representative government. There are still quite a few Republicans in Congress. What they don't deserve is to have more representation, or more power, than their numbers suggest which is the problem we now face. 30% of the US population will decide whether the entire US population gets healthcare regardless of what the rest of the population says.
Q: What about those who voted for Obama and yet disagree with the further Nationalization of healthcare? Should they, as simple "thugs", not have a voice, or are they entitled to participate in our Democracy and voice their complaints? A: It's entirely dependent on whether they act like civilized humans or freak out like a bunch of Palin supporters and start shouting people down.
We're only afraid of her in the sense that we'd be afraid of a monkey with a fully loaded M16 or a giraffe with a long range nuclear tipped ballistic missile. She's a moron and yet she was really close to attaining a level of power that would have allowed her to launch nuclear war. That is very scary. We're not scared of her political skills or her magnificent intellect if that's what you're suggesting.
I hope stepping down does derail her chances in the future, that would be best for the country and the world. Let's not get confused however on her reasons. She didn't step down to spare the state, or her family, the trouble. If she cared about the state or her family she wouldn't have done what she did in the first place. She can't trot her family out for 4 months like props in her electoral act and then whine about how the ethics charges are hurting her family.
I didn't "sidestep" your question. I answered your questions. Here it is for the slow Palin supporter. I said, of course I don't believe that. I largely dismissed your "questions" because they weren't phrased in a way that made me feel you were sincere and since I never came close to saying what you claimed I said, I rightly figured you were just being intentionally obtuse. But to answer your questions:
Q: I am curious. Do you honestly believe that all the Americans who disagree with the health care proposals are simply thugs and have no valid concerns?
A: Of course not. I do feel however that nobody on the wrong side of this has come forward and offered a single idea on how to fix the system. They seem content to maintain the status quo which just can't happen. I also think that those with valid concerns are allowing themselves to be drowned out by the thugs and Glen Becks of the world.
Q: Is this how you feel about anyone who disagrees with anything Obama and his administration are doing, or does this "thug" characterization only apply to the opponents of Obama's healthcare?
A: Again, of course not, though the discourse on that side has been so poisoned by the lies put forth by your hero Palin and Glen Beck that it's almost impossible to debate anyone on your side without getting accused of trying to steal old people's teeth.
Q: Do you believe that the nearly half of the country who didn't happen to vote for Obama are not entitled to responsive representative government?
A: They have representative government. There are still quite a few Republicans in Congress. What they don't deserve is to have more representation, or more power, than their numbers suggest which is the problem we now face. 30% of the US population will decide whether the entire US population gets healthcare regardless of what the rest of the population says.
Q: What about those who voted for Obama and yet disagree with the further Nationalization of healthcare? Should they, as simple "thugs", not have a voice, or are they entitled to participate in our Democracy and voice their complaints?
A: It's entirely dependent on whether they act like civilized humans or freak out like a bunch of Palin supporters and start shouting people down.
Reply
Leave a comment