tusixoh went and looked at the community and agreed that he overly compliments the girls and uses the term "yummy" and "sexy" too much. i go out of town and come back to this. all because i felt that 15 yr old girl didn't need to be in a NC-17 community due to the fact that one of the chics is topless a whole lot. that and there's a lot of sexual inuendo. this is what i said in my comment: i'm sorry, but i feel that regardless of your looks, you're too young to be in here since sometimes the content put up is not something for the kids. the community is for 17 and up. i don't think it was in [info]great_gatsby05's best interest to make an exception to the rule. if you let one in, others will somehow find out and complain that they should get in. plus with the content and this being an american site we need to keep up to date with all the new laws dealing with minors; even the internet ones that are being put into place. i don't feel that [info]great_gatsby05 made a good decision in this. i'm sorry, it's not really something personal against you. it's just that you're so far under the age of 18. i don't think you should be allowed in here. with the new TOS(to me it feels like they keep changing stuff almost daily anymore with this crap), mods are now held more accountable for their content and if it's adult content they are then held with the whole age restriction in which they then have to make sure that no one is a minor. otherwise someone is bound to get in trouble. not because you're showing anything, but because you now have access to other pictures that lawfully you wouldn't be allowed to see. i know, i sound mean. but i'm covering my own butt as well since if my school system saw that you were in here, somehow, i could get in trouble since it's an age restricted site. teachers are held accountable for their actions on and off school property and that goes with what they see on the internet, especially if they're using a school issued personal laptop.
you guys can yell at me all weekend, but i won't be able to respond til either monday or tuesday since i'll be out of town. i'm sorry [info]great_gatsby05, but i don't think you made a wise decision in this. sorry if i sound mean or rude. but you gotta think about the long run and what people may say. plus, there's just something about a 40 or 50 yr old man(or woman) in here staring at jailbait and possibly telling them they're hot. there's just something not right with that. even if it doesn't happen with this post, you can never be too sure.
The 15 yr old's reply was:
hey, no worries. i understand. i liked this comm but it's alright. i'll delete you guys asap !
if you can't take the heat as a mod, then get out of the kitchen. he doesn't want to admit when he's in the wrong. so be it.
Responsibility and Moderatorsnavytron89August 2 2005, 13:32:54 UTC
While I do have a fetish for redheads and pale & freckled women, I have enough common sense to keep my head on the level. Tusixoh should be paying attention more to his responsiblity as a mod and kicked her off immediately and said sorry see you in two years.
She is a pretty girl, but she can wait the required 2 years to post. Or she can just put her pictures on her own LJ and not put the responsibility on the mod.
Keeping your standards is a basic thing as a mod and knowing that waving any rights or rules leads to head aches down the road and with USSC 2256 and 2257 they are held even more up to standards.
Of course I have to blame Traci Lords for the whole child porn scandal that basically set the porn and erotic industry back 50 years.
Re: Responsibility and ModeratorspoetinplaidAugust 2 2005, 15:07:34 UTC
no no no. tusixoh was looking and noticed the mod's comments because i commented to him about him. the mod over in is < greatgatsby_05 > he throws "hot" "sex" and "yummy yummy' around a lot
Re: Responsibility and Moderatorsnavytron89August 2 2005, 16:15:33 UTC
Ooops.
Anyway its still the fact the mod needs to keep him/herself off the field as a commentator and spend time as a ref/den mother for the unrully of the group.
There are neutrally to positive things to say without crossing the line and somone who is over 25 should be able to make those comments without sounding creepy.
It seems as thought gatsby needs a little Sexual Harassment/Sensitivity training about behavior in a civilized society.
While most women I know like some form of flattery and positive comments on their appearance.
Making googly at a 15 yr old is just wrong (and right before child molestor bell starts to ring).
Re: Responsibility and ModeratorspoetinplaidAugust 2 2005, 22:01:21 UTC
this is the kind of stuff he says to the girls in there:
[info]great_gatsby05 (she had a pic of her in a towel and then without one, but from the waist up) 2005-06-28 06:18 (link) wowser. Wish I could enjoy such a shower !
(Reply to this)(Thread)
[info]wilddyingsunset 2005-06-28 23:44 (link) I am sure you can enjoy a shower
(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)
[info]great_gatsby05 2005-06-29 04:05 (link) with you I would
i don't think that's good moderating. he says no trolls and what have you, but he himself is actually a type of troll. the kind that hits on anything with a vagina
(Reply to this)(Thread) [info]stellanoelle 2005-06-20 11:51 (link) thanks James..lol. Glad you think so.
[info]great_gatsby05 sexy beyond words ! You've raised the bar and temperature in here !
Thanks for the rush !
(Reply to this) Lovely and very very sexy! Thank you again !
i think the other issue is the fact that he didn't have the balls or manners to comment to me about it. and apparently the topless chic agreed with me, she felt that the girl was way too young to look at the pics. and the 15 yr old says that she has promised him that she will not look at anything marked NWS AND that he has put on the info page that you must ask a parent to look at such pics. he's a tard if he thinks that a horny teen is going to ask a parent. he's asking for trouble and a possible lawsuit.
but again i say that he has no manners. he couldn't even wait until i came back from vacation to talk about it. he deleted my comments and banned me from the community as well as taking me off his friends page. he's a child and didn't like having his horniness pointed out i guess.
Re: Responsibility and ModeratorspoetinplaidAugust 2 2005, 22:12:15 UTC
ah yes, and this is in the rules: If you are fixated on the ladies here, be dignified about it. These beautiful women are also people who deserve respect.
he's fixated and can't behave. sadly, i enjoyed his own journal, it was interesting. oh well.
Re: Responsibility and Moderatorsnavytron89August 3 2005, 01:25:14 UTC
You have to remember that a man's ego is usually attached to his genitalia and his little head does more thinking than his big head in regards to sex/sexuality/erotica.
I do understand his behavior and had acted that way back when I was younger and didn't know any better, but time and maturity come eventually. I guess gatsby's maturity will take longer.
The other thing is if/when this girl's parent(s) find out she's been on a site that has a adult listing his ass is the one that's held accountable.
wilddyingsunset was right to agree with you and maybe he should step down as a moderator if he can be responsible.
PS. please when you get a chance let me write/access Redpinups as I have a go group of redhead cheesecake art I'd like to put up on that site. and yes its all PG/PG-13
Re: Responsibility and ModeratorspoetinplaidAugust 3 2005, 02:30:29 UTC
sure, just ask on the info page to be a member so that it'll show up on my management page. for a 30 something year old he doesn't seem to have the common sense of following the rules he made. they changed the listing to 13+ but with those posts that are more risque, i don't see the point. the kids will look if they want. and the fact that he said NC-17 and said it's something you see on cable TV. NO it is not. maybe on paid channels like HBO and Skinamax, but not on basic cable and even then there's the V-chip. regular cable tv cannot show breasts/nipples nor naughty bits. sure, a tiny bit of the butt but that's all. and he's sitting there thinking nudity (tasteful&artistic my ass. if it's in a place like that it's because girls want someone to pay attention to them and jack off to it) is ok for NC-17. if you're under 18 you're technically not legally allowed to be looking at nude pictures, hence why the mags and sites are 18+
Re: Responsibility and Moderatorsvix3nAugust 4 2005, 22:50:56 UTC
Grr where's the parents in all of this... if she posted nudes or near nudes? My parents would have killed me for doing such... people ned to moniter their kids... too many sickos online.
i go out of town and come back to this.
all because i felt that 15 yr old girl didn't need to be in a NC-17 community due to the fact that one of the chics is topless a whole lot. that and there's a lot of sexual inuendo.
this is what i said in my comment:
i'm sorry, but i feel that regardless of your looks, you're too young to be in here since sometimes the content put up is not something for the kids.
the community is for 17 and up. i don't think it was in [info]great_gatsby05's best interest to make an exception to the rule.
if you let one in, others will somehow find out and complain that they should get in.
plus with the content and this being an american site we need to keep up to date with all the new laws dealing with minors; even the internet ones that are being put into place.
i don't feel that [info]great_gatsby05 made a good decision in this. i'm sorry, it's not really something personal against you. it's just that you're so far under the age of 18. i don't think you should be allowed in here. with the new TOS(to me it feels like they keep changing stuff almost daily anymore with this crap), mods are now held more accountable for their content and if it's adult content they are then held with the whole age restriction in which they then have to make sure that no one is a minor. otherwise someone is bound to get in trouble. not because you're showing anything, but because you now have access to other pictures that lawfully you wouldn't be allowed to see.
i know, i sound mean. but i'm covering my own butt as well since if my school system saw that you were in here, somehow, i could get in trouble since it's an age restricted site. teachers are held accountable for their actions on and off school property and that goes with what they see on the internet, especially if they're using a school issued personal laptop.
you guys can yell at me all weekend, but i won't be able to respond til either monday or tuesday since i'll be out of town.
i'm sorry [info]great_gatsby05, but i don't think you made a wise decision in this. sorry if i sound mean or rude. but you gotta think about the long run and what people may say. plus, there's just something about a 40 or 50 yr old man(or woman) in here staring at jailbait and possibly telling them they're hot. there's just something not right with that. even if it doesn't happen with this post, you can never be too sure.
The 15 yr old's reply was:
hey, no worries.
i understand.
i liked this comm but it's alright.
i'll delete you guys asap !
if you can't take the heat as a mod, then get out of the kitchen. he doesn't want to admit when he's in the wrong. so be it.
Reply
She is a pretty girl, but she can wait the required 2 years to post. Or she can just put her pictures on her own LJ and not put the responsibility on the mod.
Keeping your standards is a basic thing as a mod and knowing that waving any rights or rules leads to head aches down the road and with USSC 2256 and 2257 they are held even more up to standards.
Of course I have to blame Traci Lords for the whole child porn scandal that basically set the porn and erotic industry back 50 years.
Reply
the mod over in
is < greatgatsby_05 > he throws "hot" "sex" and "yummy yummy' around a lot
Reply
Anyway its still the fact the mod needs to keep him/herself off the field as a commentator and spend time as a ref/den mother for the unrully of the group.
There are neutrally to positive things to say without crossing the line and somone who is over 25 should be able to make those comments without sounding creepy.
It seems as thought gatsby needs a little Sexual Harassment/Sensitivity training about behavior in a civilized society.
While most women I know like some form of flattery and positive comments on their appearance.
Making googly at a 15 yr old is just wrong (and right before child molestor bell starts to ring).
Reply
[info]great_gatsby05 (she had a pic of her in a towel and then without one, but from the waist up)
2005-06-28 06:18 (link)
wowser. Wish I could enjoy such a shower !
(Reply to this)(Thread)
[info]wilddyingsunset
2005-06-28 23:44 (link)
I am sure you can enjoy a shower
(Reply to this)(Parent) (Thread)
[info]great_gatsby05
2005-06-29 04:05 (link)
with you I would
i don't think that's good moderating. he says no trolls and what have you, but he himself is actually a type of troll. the kind that hits on anything with a vagina
[info]great_gatsby05
2005-06-19 09:54 (link)
triple yummy ~~~~~~~!!!!!!!!!!
(Reply to this)(Thread)
[info]stellanoelle
2005-06-20 11:51 (link)
thanks James..lol. Glad you think so.
[info]great_gatsby05
sexy beyond words !
You've raised the bar and temperature in here !
Thanks for the rush !
(Reply to this)
Lovely and very very sexy! Thank you again !
i think the other issue is the fact that he didn't have the balls or manners to comment to me about it. and apparently the topless chic agreed with me, she felt that the girl was way too young to look at the pics. and the 15 yr old says that she has promised him that she will not look at anything marked NWS AND that he has put on the info page that you must ask a parent to look at such pics.
he's a tard if he thinks that a horny teen is going to ask a parent. he's asking for trouble and a possible lawsuit.
but again i say that he has no manners. he couldn't even wait until i came back from vacation to talk about it. he deleted my comments and banned me from the community as well as taking me off his friends page.
he's a child and didn't like having his horniness pointed out i guess.
Reply
If you are fixated on the ladies here, be dignified about it. These beautiful women are also people who deserve respect.
he's fixated and can't behave.
sadly, i enjoyed his own journal, it was interesting. oh well.
Reply
I do understand his behavior and had acted that way back when I was younger and didn't know any better, but time and maturity come eventually. I guess gatsby's maturity will take longer.
The other thing is if/when this girl's parent(s) find out she's been on a site that has a adult listing his ass is the one that's held accountable.
wilddyingsunset was right to agree with you and maybe he should step down as a moderator if he can be responsible.
PS. please when you get a chance let me write/access Redpinups as I have a go group of redhead cheesecake art I'd like to put up on that site. and yes its all PG/PG-13
Reply
for a 30 something year old he doesn't seem to have the common sense of following the rules he made.
they changed the listing to 13+ but with those posts that are more risque, i don't see the point. the kids will look if they want.
and the fact that he said NC-17 and said it's something you see on cable TV. NO it is not. maybe on paid channels like HBO and Skinamax, but not on basic cable and even then there's the V-chip. regular cable tv cannot show breasts/nipples nor naughty bits. sure, a tiny bit of the butt but that's all. and he's sitting there thinking nudity (tasteful&artistic my ass. if it's in a place like that it's because girls want someone to pay attention to them and jack off to it) is ok for NC-17. if you're under 18 you're technically not legally allowed to be looking at nude pictures, hence why the mags and sites are 18+
i think his brain fell out of his ear.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment