GoT S3: the cowardly lion

Aug 10, 2013 01:58

So I am fascinated and so pleased with what Martin, D&D, and Dance are doing with Tywin Lannister. Only, I don't think I've seen my take on him posted elsewhere, which is as good an excuse as any to indulge in scathing hatred, so. Consider yourselves warned/intrigued. Spoilers through aired episodes of GoT; plot twists that haven't happened yet are ( Read more... )

game of thrones, asoiaf

Leave a comment

pocochina August 10 2013, 14:59:08 UTC
I was thinking of the use of the line in the show, though it may also be in the books. (The Mountain is still acting on Tywin's behalf, though, so I'm comfortable with the adaptation.)

This is so consistent to me I have a hard time getting my head around the idea that it could be an accident. So maybe a POV, thing, but I'd argue that if the show were trying to softpedal Tywin's behavior as being contextually appropriate, it wouldn't have included or frequently reminded us of Tysha.

It definitely chimes, however, with my confusion at his treatment of Tyrion at the end of season 2. A smart man, it seemed to me - and the show did seem to be presenting Tywin as such - would recognize Tyrion's accomplishments (and his potential to become an enemy) no matter how prejudiced he was against Tyrion's disability.

I thought that was quite clear as well, that Tywin was presented as being smart enough to understand that it was in everyone's best interests to develop and utilize Tyrion's talents, and Tywin's refusal to do so was about him being a contemptible shit toward his children.

Reply

hobbit_kate August 10 2013, 16:02:38 UTC
I was thinking of the use of the line in the show, though it may also be in the books. (The Mountain is still acting on Tywin's behalf, though, so I'm comfortable with the adaptation.)

Having finished books 2 & 3 less than a month ago, I'd have to disagree there. While his enemies will call Tywin cruel, they (Catelyn or Brynden, can't recall which one) also do mention more than once that going up against Tywin will be difficult because of his strategic prowess. It's mainly mentioned in comparison to Jaime's impatience, but still.

Tywin was presented as being smart enough to understand that it was in everyone's best interests to develop and utilize Tyrion's talents, and Tywin's refusal to do so was about him being a contemptible shit toward his children.

Couldn't agree more. He saw Tyrion's worth and chose to ignore it because he didn't like the idea of giving Tyrion any kind of power.

Reply

pocochina August 10 2013, 16:23:11 UTC
Well, in the show it's Robb speaking about Tywin, and he's right. I went and found the quote, and it is about the Mountain, but clearly about his actions on Tywin's behalf, so I stand by the point. Catelyn or the Blackfish may buy into the legend of Tywin's genius - I imagine it's quite comforting to them, to think they're losing to some Lex Luthor type - but ASOIAF is great because all narrators are unreliable. A long excerpt from that Tower of the Hand essay, because you don't want to click the link until you're caught up:

On the military side, Tywin is a good organizer, managing to raise and supply large numbers of troops even after defeats (one of the most difficult logistical feats a general can perform) and executing a nearly-flawless conquest of the Riverlands (albeit against little opposition). However, Tywin's record as a field general is more mixed -- in the early stages of the war, he takes Raventree Hall and Harrenhal against little opposition while using Jaime to do the main fighting and Clegane to disrupt the enemy's mobilization, but completely misreads Robb Stark's strategic intention and wins a tactical victory against a smaller army at the Green Fork (using a well-thought out strategy of sacrificing his left in order to provoke an over-extension, which should be noted), suffering a strategic defeat that forces him to retreat to Harrenhal. Thereafter, the Lannisters lost strategic initiative for some time, losing most of their gains in the Riverlands, suffering a disastrous series of defeats in the Westerlands, and hanging on largely due to their enemies being distracted with other quarrels. He even loses the Battle of the Fords to Edmure Tully, who's hardly the greatest commander in Westerosi history. When he does win on the field, as in the case of the Battle of the Blackwater, it's when he decisively outnumbers his opponents.

He's competent, in a by-the-numbers way, but dependent on his super-strength in resources and his willingness to use scorched-earth tactics - not an independent strategist in the way Robb (not exactly Baby Einstein) is.

Couldn't agree more. He saw Tyrion's worth and chose to ignore it because he didn't like the idea of giving Tyrion any kind of power.

Yup. (And actually, very apt in light of that passage above. Tywin gets a lot of credit for Blackwater, but the creative thinking that let the Lannister forces succeed was from Tyrion, not Tywin. And Tywin knows it.)

(sorry about all the edits.)

Reply

hobbit_kate August 10 2013, 17:01:22 UTC
He even loses the Battle of the Fords to Edmure Tully, who's hardly the greatest commander in Westerosi history.

Okay. I think you've convinced me now :D

but dependent on his super-strength in resources and his willingness to use scorched-earth tactics

Not to mention all of his "dogs". *shudder*

Everybody gets credit for Blackwater. Except Tyrion. Who discusses it at length throughout a whole book :P
And then Tywin was right to say that Tyrion would be better off not trying to seek approval all the time - but, of course, Tywin's the one who made him that way.

Reply

pocochina August 11 2013, 15:41:06 UTC
Tywin was right to say that Tyrion would be better off not trying to seek approval all the time - but, of course, Tywin's the one who made him that way.

Well, that, but also, what is his other option? Accomplish things and not want or try to get payback? Or just not contribute anything? Tyrion would be better off if he wasn't in a position where he needs to promote himself, but Tywin's mixing up correlation and causation here.

Reply

angearia August 10 2013, 23:03:14 UTC
Right, Tywin relies on massive wealth, massive numbers, and massive brutality to win the day.

He's about beating his enemy, not strategically disarming his enemy.

It's a great bit of casting, that Charles Dance carries the presence and charisma to carry the myth of Tywin's strategic genius on his shoulders.

Reply

pocochina August 11 2013, 06:17:21 UTC
Dance has been KILLING it.

Right, Tywin relies on massive wealth, massive numbers, and massive brutality to win the day.

Yes! Even their military strategy is about WE HAVE STUFF, not WE DO STUFF.

Reply

noybusiness August 11 2013, 17:45:56 UTC
He's competent, in a by-the-numbers way, but dependent on his super-strength in resources and his willingness to use scorched-earth tactics - not an independent strategist in the way Robb (not exactly Baby Einstein) is.

I totally didn't realize Tywin's tendency to overkill (in war; I noticed him being over-the-top at times in person) until you pointed it out, but it's so true.

It's like he's taken the Targaryens' "Fire and Blood" to heart. Maybe he has secret Targ envy?

Reply

pocochina August 11 2013, 18:27:14 UTC
DUDE. Targ envy explains so much. Actually, now that you mention it, a fair amount about House Lannister culture generally - the insularity, the all-or-nothing philosophy, even the dependence on social clout (since the Westerlands' gold means nothing without people agreeing to a currency economy).

Reply

noybusiness August 11 2013, 19:28:21 UTC
That reminds me how it galls him that the Lannisters are missing their Valyrian sword, and no one, even a lesser house, will give him theirs.

Reply

pocochina August 12 2013, 21:05:46 UTC
I have nothing to add but this is such a neat catch!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up