entry fifty two: it's a 'great, my life was worthless' ball.

May 20, 2010 19:02

Just what this place needs. Insects. Who's angered the Gods?

[Private to the Doctor]

why didn't you tell

everything I've ever

how much of what I thought was just

was it reall

I want to talk to you.

I also want a drink. Let me in the pub. First and only request.

[Private to the Rani - written about two am, and in a slightly sleep ( Read more... )

me and my colleagues were not pleasant, persecution complex 101, the doctor doesn't measure up, inmates swing can stand: the rani, criminology discworld style

Leave a comment

Comments 69

Private rani_ushas May 20 2010, 18:06:16 UTC
Very good, Swing.

We shall make a proper logician of you yet.

Reply

Private pleasesmirk May 20 2010, 18:07:11 UTC
I might not be able to tell when you're joking, but I can tell when you're smug. Stop it.

Reply

Re: Private rani_ushas May 20 2010, 18:09:28 UTC
Smug? I am merely pleased that you were able to reach the correct and logical conclusion. It is no small effort.

Reply

Private pleasesmirk May 20 2010, 18:11:54 UTC
No, you're smug. I can sense it a mile off. Gods, I hate it when you're right.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

Private - he lieeeeeeeeeees like a winner. or not. :/ pleasesmirk May 20 2010, 18:32:11 UTC
Thank you.

I'm fine. Just fine.

why did I have to fi

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

Private - it's kinda ooooooobvious. pleasesmirk May 20 2010, 19:24:52 UTC
...Alright, Doctor. I don't doubt you will.

Reply


Private. thegooddrjones May 20 2010, 22:26:13 UTC
What can I do for you, Swing?

Reply

Private. - he rambles when he's nervous. pleasesmirk May 20 2010, 22:41:19 UTC
I... owe you an apology, I think.

I have to explain. Um, someone pointed out to me how my scientific methods of determining things like criminality weren't... scientific at all, on the grounds all the evidence I had to back them up was, essentially, obtained under, shall we say, severe interrogation techniques.

That's not entirely the point. I also noticed that the way I theorised criminality has, on the Roundworld, an association with the sort of opinions people like Mr Booth were saying about you. I... first of all, I don't agree with that kind of thing and was, even then, a little horrified that kind of association was made, and that kind of reasoning used against... well, you know. But now I know it doesn't even really stand up to scientific rationale?

I think I ought to apologise on behalf of, well, myself, as I theorised it on the Disc, for coming up with a scientific theory which was used in that kind of way, which was not even a real science.

Yes. Well.

Reply

Private. thegooddrjones May 21 2010, 05:09:08 UTC
Swing, it's all right. I know you never had the same sort of problems with me that Booth does, and I also know that your world operates differently than mine does. I am glad you've come to the realization though, but know I've never held it against you.

How are you holding up?

Reply

Private. pleasesmirk May 21 2010, 11:26:21 UTC
You should. With everything that seems to be used to justify, you really should.

I'm fine.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up