officially pissed off by the "no weapons of mass destruction in iraq" propaganda

Oct 12, 2004 12:24

so according to the united nations, iraq COULD still have weapons of mass destruction within its borders, could be working on these weapons within others borders, OR could have sold or had them stolen. YAY!!! just cuz whitey hasnt been found doesnt mean he doesnt exist...hell he could be on his home soil, if we cant catch him what makes us think ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

pinklola October 13 2004, 08:53:32 UTC
im curious how ya figure? as u articulated it, it says they had most definately continued the development of nuclear weapons, note...that was after what have been called some of the most extreme sanctions were put in place. so its been noted that these "powerful" sanctions were broken, as i see it, the burden of proof lies within the ability to rule out any reasonable doubt, our constitution agrees with that much. the wmds werent the origional reason for hittin off war with iraq, it was a deus...the first thing that got that motive was the false belief that osama and saddam were linked and workin together. yeah, we were wrong...no denying that but when we were faced by the idea that they had wmds over there...thats when we really tossed in a shit load of people.

want evidence this arguement is legit. i stated that we cant be 100 percent positive that there are NO wmds out there. i was aggravated by these months worth of news papers headlining "no WMDS exist in iraq" or similar titles. so i simply stated that to be honest, we have no bloody clue if its there or not so who are WE to say there isnt. sure, the newspapers have said it isnt, but the UN has also been contradicting it... if these weapons they had been making showed up tomorrow on the presidents lawn, with a list of places they have been since they were moved, id have no further doubt. however, that remains highly unlikely.

that said
if there isnt, why isnt the iaea being allowed to search iraq by the US? somethings being hidden? they'd help find them faster. soy and i both kinda came to the conclusion that maybe sr bush sold them (iraq) one too many secrets when he was head of cia in '76-'77 and the plans are still out there in iraq, so lil bush is trying to cover daddys ass. thast the only reason we could thikn of for not letting the iaea search. im open to ideas....still brain storming the idea as to why the hell they arent searchin. im open to all analytical minds, people who question these circumstances...not people who simply say...this is how it is...bush is an idiot for this and this and that. truth be told, we dont know why he made his decisions...we dont get the same memos he does...who are we to be the judges when we are the least informed?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up