Privacy torts have been pressed forward in the latter half of the twentieth century. Several factors have caused this. Apsirations of privacy have increased as the general level of personal wealth has among the average citizen. Progress has been made in correcting other social wrongs (racism, sexism, etc). Also the methods of violating privacy have progressed with the emergence of the internet and other electronic data.
There are four main privacy torts: 1) intrusion upon a person's selcusion or solitude 2) appropriation, for the defendant's advantage, of the person's name or likeness 3) public disclosure of embarrassing private facts and 4) publicity which places the person in false light.
Because the photographer was probably not going to sell the picture, the model was voluntarily nude, and in a semi-public place, the third privacy tort is the only relevant concern here. However for this to succeed, the fact that the model posed nude must be highly offensive and objectionable to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities. In this day and age it is not highly objectionable that a person posed nude for an art class at a public junior college.
There are four main privacy torts: 1) intrusion upon a person's selcusion or solitude 2) appropriation, for the defendant's advantage, of the person's name or likeness 3) public disclosure of embarrassing private facts and 4) publicity which places the person in false light.
Because the photographer was probably not going to sell the picture, the model was voluntarily nude, and in a semi-public place, the third privacy tort is the only relevant concern here. However for this to succeed, the fact that the model posed nude must be highly offensive and objectionable to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities. In this day and age it is not highly objectionable that a person posed nude for an art class at a public junior college.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment