We expect British royals to favor muzzling commoners, but too many lawmakers feel the same way
As difficult as it is to sympathize with wealthy people who make a living from high-profile lives whining about the folks who
provide publicity, there's not much peril in them either. Prince Harry, after all, left the life of a human poodle in the United
Kingdom to take on the role of a less-responsible show dog in the United States. He's no danger to our liberty, though he is a
remarkably un-self-aware reminder that his ancestors once did pose a threat with similar sniffy views about "bonkers" freedoms.
Prince Harry's First Amendment Aversion, " Shut up you mouth! " Maybe he needs to be "censored"?
Opposition to free-wheeling speech is more widely shared among people who are in a position to impose a disgruntled prince's
vision of good policy on the world at large, while an immigrant tells us how to run our country.
https://reason.com/2021/05/21/prince-harrys-first-amendment-aversion-is-funny-the-governments-that-agree-are-scary/ The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.
dr. π (pi)
.